2009
DOI: 10.1587/transinf.e92.d.1771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ranking Multiple Dialogue States by Corpus Statistics to Improve Discourse Understanding in Spoken Dialogue Systems

Abstract: Ryuichiro HIGASHINAKA†a) , Nonmember and Mikio NAKANO † †b) , Member SUMMARY This paper discusses the discourse understanding process in spoken dialogue systems. This process enables a system to understand user utterances from the context of a dialogue. Ambiguity in user utterances caused by multiple speech recognition hypotheses and parsing results sometimes makes it difficult for a system to decide on a single interpretation of a user intention. As a solution, the idea of retaining possible interpretations a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been several studies on identifying the user's intentions as slot values by using history information and treating multiple candidates derived from ambiguous ASR results. In such studies, the most appropriate slot value was selected after maintaining multiple candidates using rules for tree structures that maintain histories [17], a particle filter [18], or statistics on dialogue acts and dialogue state up-dates [19]. History information has also been used to estimate confidence measures for slot values in a current user utterance [20], [21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several studies on identifying the user's intentions as slot values by using history information and treating multiple candidates derived from ambiguous ASR results. In such studies, the most appropriate slot value was selected after maintaining multiple candidates using rules for tree structures that maintain histories [17], a particle filter [18], or statistics on dialogue acts and dialogue state up-dates [19]. History information has also been used to estimate confidence measures for slot values in a current user utterance [20], [21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows the WFSTDM system. Focused on statistical models for dialog systems, thus far a statistical model of a system action sequence for dialog strategy [7] and that of user concept sequence for understanding [8] [9] [10] were investigated independently. We constructed a statistical model for dialog scenario obtained from the tag sequence of both the clerk and customer sides [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%