2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/346763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ranking DMUs by Calculating the Interval Efficiency with a Common Set of Weights in DEA

Abstract: To evaluate the performance of decision making units (DMUs), data envelopment analysis (DEA) was introduced. Basically, the traditional DEA scheme calculates the best relative efficiency score (i.e., the “optimistic” efficiency) of each DMU with the most favorable weights. A decision maker may be unable to compare and fully rank the efficiencies of different DMUs that are calculated using these potentially distinct sets of weights on the same basis. Based on the literature, the assignable worst relative effici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Choosing the individual desirable weights for each input and output of each DMU estimates the highest efficiency for each DMU and the DMUs cannot be evaluated at the same point of view. Therefore, the interval efficiency model is generated based on a common set of weights by considering positive and anti-ideal DMU [6].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Choosing the individual desirable weights for each input and output of each DMU estimates the highest efficiency for each DMU and the DMUs cannot be evaluated at the same point of view. Therefore, the interval efficiency model is generated based on a common set of weights by considering positive and anti-ideal DMU [6].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper uses the new ranking method proposed by Rezaie et al [6] that considers an integration of both "optimistic" and "pessimistic" efficiencies in the form of an interval. The method determines the lower-and upperbounds of the interval efficiency with a common set of weights.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Majority of the documentations, as found in [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] are opinions or comments directed at the determinants of absence, and interventions attempting to address those determinants, but few possess any scientific strategy. This paucity of strategic evidence is largely responsible for the concern raised in [10] relating to the existence of much ambiguity in meanings and uses of absence management mechanism-based thinking in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ramon et al [12,13] extended their research on the cross-efficiency evaluation into the common weights DEA method based on the idea of reducing differences between profiles of weights. Some other techniques have also been introduced into the DEA method for determining common weights, such as goral programming [14], regression analysis [15], robust optimization [16] and so on [17][18][19][20]. Applications of the common weights DEA models can be found in economy evaluation [21], technology selection [22], resource allocation [23], and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%