2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2013.08.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ranking decision-making units using common weights in DEA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) Ramazani-Tarkhorani et al [30] obtained a common set of weights (CSW) to create the best efficiency score of a group composed of efficient units in DEA. Development of their method for ranking of efficient candidates in voting systems may also produce interesting results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Ramazani-Tarkhorani et al [30] obtained a common set of weights (CSW) to create the best efficiency score of a group composed of efficient units in DEA. Development of their method for ranking of efficient candidates in voting systems may also produce interesting results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Olympic Games [20,21] are presented in Table 3. We use this example to compare the proposed method with Azizi and Wang's method [21] and Ramezani-Tarkhorani et al 's method [22].…”
Section: The Input and Output Data Of The Athens 2004 Summermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ramon et al [12,13] extended their research on the cross-efficiency evaluation into the common weights DEA method based on the idea of reducing differences between profiles of weights. Some other techniques have also been introduced into the DEA method for determining common weights, such as goral programming [14], regression analysis [15], robust optimization [16] and so on [17][18][19][20]. Applications of the common weights DEA models can be found in economy evaluation [21], technology selection [22], resource allocation [23], and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%