2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-73194-6_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ranking Associative Entities in Knowledge Graph by Graphical Modeling of Frequent Patterns

Abstract: Ranking associative entities in Knowledge Graph (KG) is critical for entity-oriented tasks like entity recommendation and associative inference. Existing methods benefit from explicit linkages in KG w.r.t. exactly two query entities via the closely appearing co-occurrences. Given a query including one or more entities in KG, it is necessary to obtain the implicit associative entities and uncover the strength of associations from data. To this end, we leverage KG with Web resources and propose an approach to ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of recommendation places a heavy emphasis on feature engineering and is prone to excessive specialization concerns; however, it has the potential to remove reliance on scoring data and reduce the severity of the cold start problem by matching learner and course pictures on the basis of domain knowledge [13]. Traditional techniques to course suggestion, while their ease of use, provide just a surface-level understanding of each individual learner and their preferences in terms of the course content that they would like to study [14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of recommendation places a heavy emphasis on feature engineering and is prone to excessive specialization concerns; however, it has the potential to remove reliance on scoring data and reduce the severity of the cold start problem by matching learner and course pictures on the basis of domain knowledge [13]. Traditional techniques to course suggestion, while their ease of use, provide just a surface-level understanding of each individual learner and their preferences in terms of the course content that they would like to study [14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%