Ranking and performance of Indian Universities, based on publication and citation data

Gupta, Brij Mohan

doi:10.17485/ijst/2010/v3i7.21

Cited by 20 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Other qualitative measures used for performance evaluation are the h-index, g-index, p-index, and i10 index. Several studies apply one or more of these indicators for evaluation and these papers were contributed by Cancino et al (2017), Gupta (2010), Gupta et al (2014b), Gupta and Mahesh (2013), Kaur et al (2011), Kpolovie and Onoshagbegbe (2017), Gao et al (2013), Pandita and Singh (2015), Parabhoi (2019), Prathap and Gupta (2009), Savanur and Konnur (2012), Singh and Kumar (2014), Sweileh et al (2018), Vasishta (2011), and Wang et al (2011). Cancino et al (2017) studied the innovation research (IR) output of leading universities based on the Web of Science.…”

Section: Use Of Metrics—(h Index) (G Index) (P Index) (I10 Index)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The h index and HI7 (h index in top 7 IR journals) of the University of Pennsylvania were 96 and 13, respectively followed by Harvard University h-index of 93 and HI7 was 27 and for MIT it was 76 and 31, respectively. Gupta (2010) analyzed the productivity of 50 major Indian Universities. The h-index of the University of Hyderabad, Delhi University, and Punjab University were 49, 45, and 44 respectively.…”

Section: Use Of Metrics—(h Index) (G Index) (P Index) (I10 Index)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Metrics employed in the evaluation of research productivity: A systematic literature review

Mahapatra

Sahoo

2022

Journal of Librarianship and Information Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present paper makes a systematic review of 131 articles on research productivity basing upon a model developed by Denyer and Tranfield. The current review paper analyzed the quantitative and qualitative dimensions of the sample literature in the field of research productivity. The quantitative analysis incorporates the chronological distribution of articles, keyword wise distribution, form wise distribution, discipline wise distribution, publisher wise distribution, data sources used in the articles, most prolific journals of the publications and qualitative dimensions studied are top-cited articles and all the metrices used in these articles. The paper is based upon literature retrieved from Scopus bibliographic database and other online databases like Emerald, Taylor & Francis, Google Scholar, JSTOR, ProQuest, and EBSCO for full-text articles. It was revealed that there is significant growth in the number of articles during the fourth decade (2011–2020) whereas the highest numbers of citations (1530) have been received during the third decade from 2001 to 2010. Journal articles appeared to be the predominant source of information. A wide range of metrices found to be used in the sample literature to analyze the research productivity namely basic metrics, metrics dealing with growth, collaboration and metrics at institute level and author level metrics. It will serve as a reference tool to the scholars and practitioners in the field who will be acquainted with the publications on research productivity as well as various metrices, laws of bibliometrics, statistical tools, used in the articles.

show abstract

Section: Use Of Metrics—(h Index) (G Index) (P Index) (I10 Index)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Use Of Metrics—(h Index) (G Index) (P Index) (I10 Index)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Metrics employed in the evaluation of research productivity: A systematic literature review

Mahapatra

Sahoo

2022

Journal of Librarianship and Information Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This new procedure identifies the indicators correlated with each other and then uses a composite indicator that combines quality with quantity. Gupta (2010) 2 highlighted a new methodology to rank top 50 productive Indian universities employing publication data, the citations received to the publications and collaborative publication data at the international level. Baskaran (2013) 3 studied the research performance of Alagappa University from 1999-2011 and highlighted the productivity of authors.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research Productivity and Citation Impact of Indian institutes of Science Education and Research

Sahoo

Sahu

Mohanty

2021

DESIDOC Jl. Lib. Info. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper’s main objective is to investigate the trends of basic science research in India using a combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches. It examines the publication patterns and impact of research productivity of five basic science institutions, i.e., “Indian Institutes of Science Education and Research” (IISER), namely IISER Kolkata, IISER Pune, IISER Mohali, IISER Bhopal, and IISER Thiruvananthapuram. The research output indexed in the SCOPUS bibliographic database of these five established IISERs was obtained from 2015 to 2019. A total number of 7329 research publications were analysed using various scientometric dimensions. This paper makes a concerted effort to present a comprehensive picture of the assessment of research outcomes at the five older IISERs, which are ostensibly India’s most active and prominent basic science research institutions. The findings reveal that these institutions are accountable for important research outcomes, such as a high number of citations, preferences towards open access (OA) publications, a rise in research publication year over year, a strong author network, a high degree of collaboration, and a high impact in terms of other scientometrics indicators. This paper discusses the findings of the research publications on the position of IISERs in basic sciences research and draws some conclusions about their effects.

show abstract

“…There had been no conclusive research about the improvements or decrements in various factors across the years that influence the rankings. Another paper focuses on the methodology applied to ranking of top 50 Indian universities [2] . Thus, in the literature review, it was observed that the given research papers had either compared rankings of world and Indian universities for only a year or focused on methodology related to ranking of Indian universities only.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Predictive Analysis of World University Rankings

Jahagirdar¹

2017

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper compares the top ranked world universities with the Indian universities and tries to explore the reasons behind the success of the top ranked universities. It tries to explore the various factors and the influence they have on rankings. The paper tries to prioritize the various factors influencing the world university rankings. This paper aims to suggest some important measures institutions can undertake to improve their rankings on a global level. It tries to predict the world ranking of a particular university based on certain factors which will save cost and thus provide a good cost-benefit analysis.

show abstract

Ranking and performance of Indian Universities, based on publication and citation data

Cited by 20 publications

References 0 publications

Metrics employed in the evaluation of research productivity: A systematic literature review

Metrics employed in the evaluation of research productivity: A systematic literature review

Research Productivity and Citation Impact of Indian institutes of Science Education and Research

Predictive Analysis of World University Rankings

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About