2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rank of green building material criteria based on the three pillars of sustainability using the hybrid multi criteria decision making method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A multi-criteria evaluation method was proposed by Konidari and Mavrakis [72], which has been commonly used to evaluate of climate policies (among others, [9,73,74]). Such analysis compares the policy options against a plurality of environmental, economic and procedural criteria to identify options that would not only be feasible but also effective in overcoming present shortcomings and avoiding them in the future.…”
Section: Multi-criteria Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multi-criteria evaluation method was proposed by Konidari and Mavrakis [72], which has been commonly used to evaluate of climate policies (among others, [9,73,74]). Such analysis compares the policy options against a plurality of environmental, economic and procedural criteria to identify options that would not only be feasible but also effective in overcoming present shortcomings and avoiding them in the future.…”
Section: Multi-criteria Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several issues also exist in comparing or prioritizing several alternatives for decision making, such as how to make trade‐offs among socio‐political, environmental, and economic factors and how to deal with indicators with different forms and units. Multicriteria decision‐making (MCDM) methods can be adopted to address these issues and thus provide solid and logical backbone for the model (Khoshnava et al, ; Talukder, Hipel, & vanLoon, ). Various MCDM methods have been adopted in various decision making situations, such as analytical hierarchy process (AHP; Ren, Manzardo, Mazzi, Zuliani, & Scipioni, ; Sambasivan & Fei, ; Thanki, Govindan, & Thakkar, ; Tseng, Lin, & Chiu, ), ELECTRE (Hatami‐Marbini & Tavana, ; Kaya & Kahraman, ; Wen, Yu, & Yan, ), TOPSIS (Joshi & Kumar, ; Kaya & Kahraman, ; Kluczek & Gladysz, ), and PROMETHEE (Arıkan, Şimşit‐Kalender, & Vayvay, ; Athawale & Chakraborty, ; Ren et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several previous studies have emphasized the vital role of environmental sustainability in various applications areas such as waste management [1][2][3][4], energy [5][6][7][8], sustainability performance [9][10][11], green product [12][13][14][15], low carbon and climate [16][17][18], tourism [19][20][21][22], information and communication technology [23][24][25][26], health [27,28], behavioral science [29,30], innovation [31][32][33], economic development [34][35][36][37], risk assessment [38][39][40], decision making [41][42][43][44], tourist behaviour [45][46][47][48], business practices …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%