2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-005-0960-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rank differences in energy intake rates in white-faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus capucinus: the effects of contest competition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
95
2
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
6
95
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, we could not detect clear negative effects of social factors on patch use through scramble and contest competitions suggested by previous studies (e.g., Grand & Dill, 1999;Snaith & Chapman, 2005;Vogel, 2005). Instead, our results show that the presence of other group members in the same food patches had consistent positive effects on foraging success.…”
Section: Social Factors Enhancing Foraging Successcontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, we could not detect clear negative effects of social factors on patch use through scramble and contest competitions suggested by previous studies (e.g., Grand & Dill, 1999;Snaith & Chapman, 2005;Vogel, 2005). Instead, our results show that the presence of other group members in the same food patches had consistent positive effects on foraging success.…”
Section: Social Factors Enhancing Foraging Successcontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…As a result, the amount of food items consumed in the food patches may decrease. Such negative effects of contest feeding competition are more apparent in lower-ranking individuals (Saito, 1996;Vogel, 2005). We tested the negative effects on the percentage of time spent feeding and intake speed in each session, and the residence time and total amount of food Mann-Whitney U-tests, we compared the percentage of time spent feeding and intake speed in sessions, residence time and total amount of food items consumed in each patch with and without aggressive behaviors for food types observed three or more cases of aggressive interactions (i.e., se-FC, lf-ZS, and fl-PV).We also tested the relationship between dominance rank and the frequency of aggressive behaviors using a generalized linear model (GLM, using R.2.5.…”
Section: Contest Feeding Competition (Prediction 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual studies of food distribution and agonism have supported parts of these predictions (overview in [86,101]), including widespread evidence that monopolizable resources elicit increased rates of agonism [102][103][104][105][106][107]. Broader comparisons across a large number of species have been hampered by the paucity of studies that incorporate measures of contestability on a scale that is relevant to the study animals [46,47,108].…”
Section: (B) Testing Links Between Agonism and Social Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of their large range and relatively dense populations, white-faced capuchins are a well-studied species (e.g. Hall, 2000;Rose, 2000;Williams, & vaughan, 2001;Perry et al, 2003;vogel, 2005;Crofoot et al, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%