2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/asonam.2016.7752223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rank degree: An efficient algorithm for graph sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A detailed analysis of the algorithm can be found in Voudigari et al (2016) and Salamanos et al (2017) , where we have thoroughly studied the properties and the efficiency of the algorithm as well as other variations of the selection rule.…”
Section: The Rank Degree Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A detailed analysis of the algorithm can be found in Voudigari et al (2016) and Salamanos et al (2017) , where we have thoroughly studied the properties and the efficiency of the algorithm as well as other variations of the selection rule.…”
Section: The Rank Degree Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first preliminary study which investigates the applications of graph sampling to the influential spreaders identification problem has been conducted in Salamanos et al (2016) , where we studied the effectiveness of Rank Degree as influential spreaders identifier. The Rank Degree is a graph exploration sampling method which can produce representative samples/subgraphs from an unknown graph, using only local information, that is the degree of the visited nodes ( Voudigari et al 2016 ; Salamanos et al 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, non-sampled nodes with strong connections to the already sampled nodes, even with high degree, may not be collected. In the Rank Degree method [12], the exploration rule is slightly different, the degree of the neighbors guides the propagation. Furthermore, the initial set may contain many nodes taken at random, while the previous sampling uses a single or a few starting points.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Is there any ideal number of nodes to follow? If such a number exists, is it dependent on the degree of the nodes being visited in each time step [131]?…”
Section: Chapter Introduction 11 Motivation and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a sampling method could serve effectively as a best spreaders identifier if and only if: (a) the fraction of top-k common nodes in the samples and in the graph is on average sufficiently large and (b) the rankings of these nodes in the samples are close to the original ranking in the graph. We address these requirements using Rank Degree [131], a graph exploration sampling method which has been proved to outperform other well-known methods such as the Forest Fire and the Frontier sampling [79,76,109]. We conduct extensive experiments in five real-world networks using four centrality metrics in order to rank the nodes with respect to spreading efficiency.…”
Section: Chapter Introduction 11 Motivation and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%