2013
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rank‐Based Robust Tests for Quantitative‐Trait Genetic Association Studies

Abstract: Standard linear regression is commonly used for genetic association studies of quantitative traits. This approach may not be appropriate if the trait, on its original or transformed scales, does not follow a normal distribution. A rank-based nonparametric approach that does not rely on any distributional assumptions can be an attractive alternative. Although several nonparametric tests exist in the literature, their performance in the genetic association setting is not well studied. We evaluate various nonpara… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The minimum value of anti-CCP for these 868 individuals is 20.053. As shown in Li et al 6, neither the original values of anti-CCP (p-value using Shapiro-Wilk test is 10 −16 ) nor their logarithm transformation ones (p-value is 3.9 × 10 −9 ) follow the normal distribution. It is most likely that the observed anti-CCP measurements come from a truncated distribution since the anti-CCP is often measured to confirm RA and so it is not measured in controls.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The minimum value of anti-CCP for these 868 individuals is 20.053. As shown in Li et al 6, neither the original values of anti-CCP (p-value using Shapiro-Wilk test is 10 −16 ) nor their logarithm transformation ones (p-value is 3.9 × 10 −9 ) follow the normal distribution. It is most likely that the observed anti-CCP measurements come from a truncated distribution since the anti-CCP is often measured to confirm RA and so it is not measured in controls.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The Kruskal-Wallis test1, the Jonckheere-Terpstra test23, the U-statistics-based tests45, and the nonparametric trend test6 can be used to evaluate the association between the genetic variants and the quantitative traits for the non-normal trait values. The distributions or the approximate distributions of the test statistics are derived under the null hypothesis that the genotypes are not associated with the traits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For m=1,2,...,M, we define truerightZm=left1n{3η1m(1η1m)1/2R¯1mn+12left+}23η2m(1η2m)1/2R¯2mn+12.Zm is the numerator of the nonparametric trend test proposed by Li et al. (). The variance of Zm is given by Theorem 1 in Li et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods cannot be applied to quantitative traits directly, especially when the trait values do not follow the normal distribution. Although some nonparametric association tests such as the JT test (Jonckheere, ; Terpstra, ), the KW test (Kruskal and Wallis, ), and the nonparametric trend test (Li et al., ) can be applied to non‐normal traits, these tests focus on single SNP analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation