Rango de acción del colocador como indicador de rendimiento en voleibol masculino

Abstract

Este estudio buscó comprobar si la zona ideal de colocación es la más usada, comparar dicha zona con la Posición Media (AP) del colocador con disponibilidad de primer tiempo y verificar si la distancia entre ambas puede considerarse un indicador de rendimiento. Analizamos 2291 acciones de los 12 mejores equipos del mundial masculino de voleibol (2010). Registramos la posición (latitud y profundidad) del colocador. Calculamos su AP y la distancia a la zona ideal. Recogimos la eficacia de recepción desde las estadísticas de la FIVB. Una correlación aportó la Rho de Spearman. Los resultados confirman el área de latitud 6 y profundidad 1 como la más exitosa, pero los equipos pueden contar con primer tiempo cuando el colocador sale de ella. La distancia entre la AP con disponibilidad de primer tiempo y la zona ideal de colocación correlaciona con la clasificación final más que la eficacia de recepción.

Social Network Analysis: Understanding Volleyball Dynamics through Match Opponents

“…Losing teams exhibit higher eigenvector values for TF and TC, while winning teams show higher eigenvector values for TF and T7 [10]. Thus, the team's attacking performance is related to the distance the setter is from the attackers and the net [65,66], suggesting that in Brazilian volleyball, it is preferred to play with the middle-blocker ahead and close to the setter (TF), increasing the displacement of the opposing team's blocker.…”

“…Although volleyball studies on game patterns are well-established in the literature, it is evident that many analyses are generalized, overlooking specificities that may vary depending on teams [19,28,32,33,[48][49][50][51][52]. Although research in this field considers the game ecological context within a competitive environment, it often fails to consider the dynamic interaction between the individual and the game environment through the possibilities of action, which emanate from different configurations of the game [5,7,[53][54][55].…”

Setting Decision Making in male high- level volleyball: a study from ecological theory and social network analysis perspective

“…In other words, it is making unfeasible for the opponent blocker to anticipate, a fact that could generate the attack by the central with no blocking. In this context, the importance of the main attacker in quick attacks is perceived as a predictor of attack success (Asterios et al, 2009;Palao et al, 2007), mainly when the attack occurs between positions 2 and 3 with the ball close to the net (Mercado-Palomino et al, 2022). In addition, the fact that the setter decides to "keep" the central attacker next to him improves the game reading, as well as creates the opportunity to attack against simple blocking structures, as the high-level setter considers the affordances of the game context, precisely the disposition of the extremity blockers, to carry out the setting (Rocha et al, 2020).…”