2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12263-017-0589-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ranges of phenotypic flexibility in healthy subjects

Abstract: BackgroundA key feature of metabolic health is the ability to adapt upon dietary perturbations. A systemic review defined an optimal nutritional challenge test, the “PhenFlex test” (PFT). Recently, it has been shown that the PFT enables the quantification of all relevant metabolic processes involved in maintaining or regaining homeostasis of metabolic health. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that quantification of PFT response was more sensitive as compared to fasting markers in demonstrating reduced phenotypi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Challenge tests began at 9 AM after a 12-h fasting period. The MMTT was a high-fat, high-glucose, high-calorie drink (400 ml) consisting of 320 ml tap water, 75 g glucose, 60 g palm oil, 20 g Protifar as a milk protein concentrate (Nutricia, Utrecht, The Netherlands), and 0.5 g artificial vanilla aroma resulting in a shake with 33, 59, and 8% of energy from carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins, respectively (7,8). The drink was ingested within 5 min, and blood was collected in heparin-coated tubes at 0, 60, 120, 240, 360, and 480 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Challenge tests began at 9 AM after a 12-h fasting period. The MMTT was a high-fat, high-glucose, high-calorie drink (400 ml) consisting of 320 ml tap water, 75 g glucose, 60 g palm oil, 20 g Protifar as a milk protein concentrate (Nutricia, Utrecht, The Netherlands), and 0.5 g artificial vanilla aroma resulting in a shake with 33, 59, and 8% of energy from carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins, respectively (7,8). The drink was ingested within 5 min, and blood was collected in heparin-coated tubes at 0, 60, 120, 240, 360, and 480 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring timeresolved metabolic changes underlying the disturbance and regaining of homeostasis, rather than static measurements, ABBREVIATIONS: AT, adipose tissue; AUC, area under the curve; BCAA, branched-chain amino acid; GGT, g-glutamyl transpeptidase; LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; lyso-PC, lysophosphatidylcholine; MMTT, mixed meal tolerance test; NEFA, nonesterified fatty acid; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PCA, principal components analysis; PLS-DA, partial least squares-discriminant analysis such as after an overnight fast, may thus deliver more predictive parameters of the health status (3,4). In fact, the responses to a lifestyle intervention or the effects of a metabolic disease can be more comprehensively evaluated when dietary challenges are used (5)(6)(7)(8). The ability to adapt to a challenge such as an oral glucose tolerance test or a mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) has been coined phenotypic flexibility (4,9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of a mixed-meal challenge, comprising protein, glucose and lipids, has been proposed to target multiple organs and more broadly encompass phenotypic flexibility (Stroeve et al 2015 ; Wopereis et al 2017 ). By challenging metabolic regulatory processes by means of a dietary challenge, dynamic changes in nutrient metabolism might be uncovered, allowing better exploration of the individual capacity to cope with metabolic stressors (Krug et al 2012 ; Broek et al 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next step would be the subsequent integration of these combined data [ 52 ], which will yield a quantified degree of resilience of an individual which can be compared to others [ 50 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 ]. This approach will deliver us a next generation of biomarkers [ 8 ] or early biomarkers of disease or effects ( Figure 1 adapted from [ 58 ]).…”
Section: Alternative Methods For Measurement Of Health Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%