1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.1992.tb00406.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Range‐wide Survey and Estimation of Total Number of Steller Sea Lions in 1989

Abstract: The first range-wide survey of Steller (northern) sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) was completed in 1989 with a total of 68,094 adult and juvenile (nonpup) Steller sea lions counted. This total count includes 10,000 in Russia (15% of the range-wide count), 47,960 in Alaska (70%), 6,109 in British Columbia (9%), 2,261 in Oregon (3%), and 1,764 in California (3%). A range-wide pup count was not obtained. We estimated the 1989 world population based on a calculation for total pups and obtained a range-wide estimate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this study represented only a short period within a nearly 30 year decline, during which considerable changes occurred. For example, severe declines first began in the EAI during the early 1970s (Kenyon and Rice 1961, Braham et al 1980, Loughlin et al 1992, but this area is now relatively stable with respect to other regions comprising the western DPS (Fritz and Stinchcomb 2005). Unfortunately, understanding the effects of long-term environmental change on the regulation of population structure has been hampered by lack of historical data on the abundance of Steller sea lions prior to the 1970s (Francis et al 1998), confounding effects of anthropogenic disturbance, three climatic regime shifts (Mantua et al 1997, Mantua andHare 2002), and the idea that proximate causes of mortality have changed during the past three decades (York 1994, York et al 1996, Holmes and York 2003.…”
Section: Chlorophyll a Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this study represented only a short period within a nearly 30 year decline, during which considerable changes occurred. For example, severe declines first began in the EAI during the early 1970s (Kenyon and Rice 1961, Braham et al 1980, Loughlin et al 1992, but this area is now relatively stable with respect to other regions comprising the western DPS (Fritz and Stinchcomb 2005). Unfortunately, understanding the effects of long-term environmental change on the regulation of population structure has been hampered by lack of historical data on the abundance of Steller sea lions prior to the 1970s (Francis et al 1998), confounding effects of anthropogenic disturbance, three climatic regime shifts (Mantua et al 1997, Mantua andHare 2002), and the idea that proximate causes of mortality have changed during the past three decades (York 1994, York et al 1996, Holmes and York 2003.…”
Section: Chlorophyll a Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steller sea lions in the Salish Sea are part of the genetically distinct eastern stock, comprising individuals born at rookeries east and south of Cape Suckling, Alaska at southeastern Alaska, British Columbia, Oregon and California (Bickham et al 1996, Loughlin 1997. That stock has rookeries in southeastern Alaska, British Columbia, Oregon and California (Bigg 1988a, Loughlin et al 1992, RaumSuryan et al 2002, Fisheries and Oceans Canada 2008. California sea lions do not breed north of California, although adults and subadults regularly disperse into Canadian and increasingly Alaskan waters during the nonbreeding season to exploit food resources (Jeffries et al 2000, Maniscalco et al 2004, Carretta et al 2011.…”
Section: Resale or Republication Not Permitted Without Written Consenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only photos of sea lions collected on the one-way trips were The number of sea lions sighted per length of searched subs trip was used as encounter rates for representing the distribution of sea lions in coastal waters as we did not record the distance from the airplane to the sea lions in the water. The encounter rates were calculated only from the data obtained on 3 2001 also could not be used for these calculations due to use of the older global positioning system. The numbers of sea lions in the water collected within 500 m of haulout rocks were also not used to calculate encounter rates.…”
Section: Aerial Survey and Interviewmentioning
confidence: 99%