Range Size and Extinction Risk in Forest Birds

Abstract

Small geographical range size is the single best predictor of threat of extinction in terrestrial species. Knowing how small a species' range has to be before authorities consider it threatened with extinction would allow prediction of a species' risk from continued deforestation and warming climates and provide a baseline for conservation and management strategies aspiring to mitigate these threats. To determine the threshold at which forest-dependent bird species become threatened with extinction, we compared the range sizes of threatened and nonthreatened species. In doing so, we present a simple, repeatable, and practical protocol to quantify range size. We started with species' ranges published in field guides or comparable sources. We then trimmed these ranges, that is, we included only those parts of the ranges that met the species' requirements of elevation and types of forest preferred. Finally, we further trimmed the ranges to the amount of forest cover that remains. This protocol generated an estimate of the remaining suitable range for each species. We compared these range estimates with those from the World Conservation Union Red List. We used the smaller of the two estimates to determine the threshold, 11,000 km2, below which birds should be considered threatened. Species considered threatened that have larger ranges than this qualified under other (nonspatial) red list criteria. We identified a suite of species (18) that have not yet qualified as threatened but that have perilously small ranges--about 11% of the nonthreatened birds we analyzed. These birds are likely at risk of extinction and reevaluation of their status is urgently needed.

Global Change Projections for Taiwan Island Birds: Linking Current and Future Distributions

“…The distributions of three other species had large decreases in size even though they had wider elevational ranges (Table 2). This result does not entirely agree with recent findings by Sekercioglu et al (2008) and Harris and Pimm (2008), who mentioned that species with wider elevational ranges were less likely to be threatened by global climate change. In comparisons with La Sorte and Jetz's findings (2010b), our results were much similar to simulated species being treated under a constrained vertical dispersal scenario than global montane birds in their study, but however, also not exactly the same.…”

Defaunation as a trigger for the additional loss of plant species in fragmented landscapes: considerations on the state of Espírito Santo, southeastern Brazil

“…Large birds, such as the curassows and guans, also suffer from both predation and poaching (Michalski & Peres 2005Barlow et al 2006) and are likely to disappear rapidly from fragments (Harris & Pimm 2008). Because they are large, they can also consume larger fruits, often entirely, and thereby carry their seeds (disperse) longer distances where they will be defecated.…”

Museum specimens reveal loss of pollen host plants as key factor driving wild bee decline in The Netherlands

“…In addition, if host plant use is measured for more individuals of abundant, widespread species than for rare ones, an apparent link between diet breadth and population trend may simply arise as a sampling artifact (16). Furthermore, the relationship between host plant use and population trend may be confounded by species' rarity prior to the onset of major environmental changes (17), as rarity in itself increases susceptibility to stochastic events (18) and has been shown to be one of the most important factors predicting population decline in various taxa (19)(20)(21). Surprisingly, to our knowledge, none of the studies that have so far examined the relationship between diet breadth and/or host plant preference and bee population trends have taken species' initial rarity into account (e.g., refs.…”