Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms 2011
DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611973082.63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Range Selection and Median: Tight Cell Probe Lower Bounds and Adaptive Data Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that Lemma 6 essentially is a generalization of the results proved in the static range counting papers [6,3], simply phrased in terms of cell subsets answering many queries instead of communication complexity. Since the proof contains only few new ideas, we have deferred it to Section 5 and instead move on to the encoding and decoding procedures.…”
Section: The Set Of Incidence Vectorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note that Lemma 6 essentially is a generalization of the results proved in the static range counting papers [6,3], simply phrased in terms of cell subsets answering many queries instead of communication complexity. Since the proof contains only few new ideas, we have deferred it to Section 5 and instead move on to the encoding and decoding procedures.…”
Section: The Set Of Incidence Vectorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In [7] he reproved this bound using an elegant reduction from the communication game known as lop-sided set disjointness. Subsequently Jørgensen and Larsen [3] proved a matching bound for the strongly related problems of range selection and range median. Finally, as mentioned earlier, Pǎtraşcu [6] proved a max{t q , t u } = Ω((lg n/ lg lg n)…”
Section: The Cell Probe Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem has recently been studied intensively in its non-encoding version [5,6,9,10,14]. Jørgensen and Larsen [14] obtained a query time of O(lg k/ lg lg n+ lg lg n), very recently improved to O(lg k/ lg lg n) by Chan and Wilkinson [6], both using Θ(n) words, i.e., Ω(n lg n) bits. Jørgensen and Larsen [14] introduced the κ-capped range selection problem, where a parameter κ is given at preprocessing time, and the data structure only supports selection for ranks k ≤ κ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jørgensen and Larsen [14] obtained a query time of O(lg k/ lg lg n+ lg lg n), very recently improved to O(lg k/ lg lg n) by Chan and Wilkinson [6], both using Θ(n) words, i.e., Ω(n lg n) bits. Jørgensen and Larsen [14] introduced the κ-capped range selection problem, where a parameter κ is given at preprocessing time, and the data structure only supports selection for ranks k ≤ κ. They showed that even the one-sided κ-capped range selection problem requires query time Ω(lg k/ lg lg n) for structures using O(n polylog n) words, and the result of Chan and Wilkinson is therefore the best possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation