2020
DOI: 10.1080/10833196.2020.1867393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Range of motion as an outcome measure for knee osteoarthritis interventions in clinical trials: an integrated review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We combined patient-reported outcome measures (pain and function) with physical outcomes (flexion data), thereby increasing the robustness of our estimates. This accords with recommendations for a holistic approach in disability measures with a combination of physical and patient-reported outcomes [ 35 , 122 ]. This method for estimating an MCIC may be useful where it is difficult to formulate sensitive anchor questions or where recall bias is an issue [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We combined patient-reported outcome measures (pain and function) with physical outcomes (flexion data), thereby increasing the robustness of our estimates. This accords with recommendations for a holistic approach in disability measures with a combination of physical and patient-reported outcomes [ 35 , 122 ]. This method for estimating an MCIC may be useful where it is difficult to formulate sensitive anchor questions or where recall bias is an issue [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The tools included intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Lower Extremity Functional Scale, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System, and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, VAS and WOMAC. We included studies that measured flexion using a universal goniometer, electrogoniometer or inclinometer in a static position as flexion assessed using the above tools is considered a valid and accessible outcome measure in knee OA [ 33 35 ]. Studies that assessed knee flexion during functional activities (for example gait, squatting, stair climbing) were excluded as they do not consider the full flexion range.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knee ROM is commonly used as an outcome measure in clinical studies of people with knee OA, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and in athletes. 21 , 22 Steultjens et al demonstrated that the mean knee ROM in an OA group was 19% lower than in control group. 21 In another study, McCarthy et al reported that patients with knee OA had significantly lower knee flexion ROM than matched controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects were also advised to keep their low back flat on the table during the procedure to limit further possible pelvic rotation during the measurement [ 2 , 8 ]. The standard error of measurement reported for the universal goniometric measurement of knee extensions ranged from 0.72° to 4.2°, with most of the studies reporting it to be around 1.5° ± 0.5° [ 19 , 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%