2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Range of interaction in an opinion evolution model of ideological self-positioning: Contagion, hesitance and polarization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They can be enriched with the inclusion of a third state, o = 0, representing neutral state or indecision. Indecision is a current and rising phenomenon which affects both recent and consolidated democracies [28]. Many reasons can lead an individual to become neutral or undecided, for example it can be associated to an anticonformism/nonconformism to the proposals on both sides of the debate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They can be enriched with the inclusion of a third state, o = 0, representing neutral state or indecision. Indecision is a current and rising phenomenon which affects both recent and consolidated democracies [28]. Many reasons can lead an individual to become neutral or undecided, for example it can be associated to an anticonformism/nonconformism to the proposals on both sides of the debate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many reasons can lead an individual to become neutral or undecided, for example it can be associated to an anticonformism/nonconformism to the proposals on both sides of the debate. The impact of indecision/neutrality was considered recently in many works [8,12,17,28,29,30,31,32,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to some scholars, polarization phenomenon refers to the social phenomenon that the viewpoint of most individuals is extreme in the group. The degree of group polarization is measured by the proportions of extreme viewpoint in the group [5,6]. The polarization phenomenon can be measured by analysing the average values of individual emotions at the very beginning of an event and after the occurrence of group polarization.…”
Section: Research Status Of Online Public Opinion Group Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to model more realistic scenarios, many variations of the VM have been proposed and studied (see reviews [ 4 , 5 ] and references therein). Some examples include multiple opinion states [ 6 , 7 , 8 ], individual heterogeneity and stubbornness [ 9 ], opinion leaders and zealots [ 10 ], and complex interaction topologies that could be static [ 11 , 12 , 13 ] or evolve in time [ 14 , 15 , 16 ]. In particular, it is expected that opinion patterns in real life resemble those of coexistence of both opinions, rather than a perfect consensus of a single opinion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%