2014 IEEE Radar Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1109/radar.2014.6875789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Range cell migration correction for dim maneuvering target detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we investigate the behavior of the proposed architectures in terms of probability of detection (P d ), computational complexity, and mean value of misclassified pulses (MVMP) defined as the sum of the number of pulses containing target components but classified as noise and the number of noise-only pulses classified as target (this metric is estimated only for the TSAs since OSAs inherit the selection capabilities of BIC). The competitors are the likelihood ratio test assuming perfect knowledge of l, h, and M (clairvoyant detector), the GAMF and the generalized adaptive subspace detector (GASD) [16] both over data from two range cells, and the best detector of [14] defined by (10) and (11) (2S-GIC) and fed by data from the first range bin. Notice that the clairvoyant detector represents an upper bound for the performance.…”
Section: Performance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this section, we investigate the behavior of the proposed architectures in terms of probability of detection (P d ), computational complexity, and mean value of misclassified pulses (MVMP) defined as the sum of the number of pulses containing target components but classified as noise and the number of noise-only pulses classified as target (this metric is estimated only for the TSAs since OSAs inherit the selection capabilities of BIC). The competitors are the likelihood ratio test assuming perfect knowledge of l, h, and M (clairvoyant detector), the GAMF and the generalized adaptive subspace detector (GASD) [16] both over data from two range cells, and the best detector of [14] defined by (10) and (11) (2S-GIC) and fed by data from the first range bin. Notice that the clairvoyant detector represents an upper bound for the performance.…”
Section: Performance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, radar systems transmit long bursts of pulses and integrate the corresponding backscattered energy. However, dim maneuvering targets can move through more than one range cell within the integration time interval [10]. As a consequence, it prevents conventional decision schemes from exploiting all the backscattered energy, since they are fed by the range bin under test only and, hence, do not account for the target migration to the contiguous range bin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, this method applies to only cases in which the SNR is not too low. Tian et al [10] and Dai and Zhang [11] proposed the generalized keystone transform, which can eliminate range migration caused by target motion of the second order and above (acceleration and jerk). Li et al [12] proposed a fast algorithm to process the result of the generalized keystone transform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, conventional KT can only correct the first-order RM. Thus [6][7][8] studied second-order KT to correct the second-order RM and Kong et al [9] proposed a coherent integration method via generalized KT and generalized dechirp process (GKTGDP) for maneuvering targets with arbitrary high-order RM. It is worth paying attention to that KT could be invalid without ambiguity correction if Doppler ambiguity happens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%