2020
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2019.2948518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Range and Velocity Estimation Using Kernel Maximum Correntropy Based Nonlinear Estimators in Non-Gaussian Clutter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Performance of the proposed estimator is compared with the derived analytical expression for modified Cramer-Rao lower bound (MCRLB) of DOD, DOA, and Doppler shift. • The presented computer simulations indicate that the proposed estimator in addition to outperforming the other ITC based kernel estimators like KLMS-NC [21] and KMC-NC [25], also outperforms the estimators proposed in [13], [14], [15], and [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• Performance of the proposed estimator is compared with the derived analytical expression for modified Cramer-Rao lower bound (MCRLB) of DOD, DOA, and Doppler shift. • The presented computer simulations indicate that the proposed estimator in addition to outperforming the other ITC based kernel estimators like KLMS-NC [21] and KMC-NC [25], also outperforms the estimators proposed in [13], [14], [15], and [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, since KLMS utilizes mean square error (MSE) criterion [22]- [24], and is optimum for Gaussian noise, the estimation algorithm proposed in [20], [21] cannot be used for the estimation of parameters in MIMO radar system perturbed by non-Gaussian clutter. In a later attempt to deal with the effects of non-Gaussian clutter, kernel maximum correntropy (KMC) based estimator proves to be better than estimator based on KLMS [25]. Nevertheless, performance of KMC based estimator may not be good when facing more complicated non-Gaussian clutter [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent works promote the explicit Monte-Carlo approximations of the RKHS, called random Fourier features (RFF), which significantly improves convergence and reduces implementation complexity compared to the pre-existing dictionary based approaches [10]- [13]. In addition, other important works have extended the scope of RKHS based approaches to other applications, such as, detection for massive MIMO (m-MIMO) [13]- [15], parameter-estimation for radar [16], [17], and detection for ultraviolet communications [18]. Further, other works have proposed the RFF based DL (RFF-DL) [19] and hyperparameter-independent RFFs [13], [20], and have carried out a rigorous analysis of RFF-DL in the low-data regime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent works promote the explicit Monte-Carlo approximations of the RKHS, called random Fourier features (RFF), which significantly improves convergence and reduces implementation complexity compared to the pre-existing dictionary based approaches [10]- [13]. In addition, other important works have extended the scope of RKHS based approaches to other applications, such as, detection for massive MIMO (m-MIMO) [13]- [15], parameter-estimation for radar [16], [17], and detection for ultraviolet communications [18]. Further, other works have proposed the RFF based DL (RFF-DL) [19] and hyperparameter-independent RFFs [13], [20], and have carried out a rigorous analysis of RFF-DL in the low-data regime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%