1956
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1956.6.h.205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomness of Threshold Responses at Long Interstimulus Intervals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1964
1964
1970
1970

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A rotary switch driven by a synchronous motor keyed a signal once every 15 seconds; a short flash of light preceded each stimulus by 1 second as a "ready" signal. These arrangements have been shown to minimize the risk of serial correlation between successive re- spouses (Day, 1956). A microswitch response key was attached to each arm of the subject's chair; he was instructed to press the righthand key if he judged a signal to be present, the left-hand key if he judged it to be absent.…”
Section: Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rotary switch driven by a synchronous motor keyed a signal once every 15 seconds; a short flash of light preceded each stimulus by 1 second as a "ready" signal. These arrangements have been shown to minimize the risk of serial correlation between successive re- spouses (Day, 1956). A microswitch response key was attached to each arm of the subject's chair; he was instructed to press the righthand key if he judged a signal to be present, the left-hand key if he judged it to be absent.…”
Section: Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%