2017
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.191346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Trial on PET/CT Imaging Requires Adequate Follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FDG PET showed several slight FDG-like skin lesions in chest and back, involving left inguinal lymph nodes, and obvious FDG-like subcutaneous mass in left calf [7]. Sauerland thinks that the statement that "PET is better than tomography" is too optimistic and needs further and more reliable tests to confirm [8]. Ceyrat found high 18F-FDG uptake in breast lesions of a 36-year-old woman who received PET for initial staging of diffuse large b-cell lymphoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FDG PET showed several slight FDG-like skin lesions in chest and back, involving left inguinal lymph nodes, and obvious FDG-like subcutaneous mass in left calf [7]. Sauerland thinks that the statement that "PET is better than tomography" is too optimistic and needs further and more reliable tests to confirm [8]. Ceyrat found high 18F-FDG uptake in breast lesions of a 36-year-old woman who received PET for initial staging of diffuse large b-cell lymphoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%