2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2016.12.004
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Trial of Treat-and-Extend versus Monthly Dosing for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
86
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
86
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In other studies, injection intervals were adjusted by 2-week increments with a set minimum injection interval of 4 weeks and a maximum of 12 weeks [21][22][23]. In ALTAIR, 57-60% of patients achieved a last injection interval of at least 12 weeks up to week 96, compared with 17-37% of patients in other prospective studies of ranibizumab and IVT-AFL T&E regimens [21,[24][25][26]. Up to week 96, 41-46% of patients in ALTAIR reached the maximum last injection interval of 16 weeks either with 2-or 4-week adjustments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other studies, injection intervals were adjusted by 2-week increments with a set minimum injection interval of 4 weeks and a maximum of 12 weeks [21][22][23]. In ALTAIR, 57-60% of patients achieved a last injection interval of at least 12 weeks up to week 96, compared with 17-37% of patients in other prospective studies of ranibizumab and IVT-AFL T&E regimens [21,[24][25][26]. Up to week 96, 41-46% of patients in ALTAIR reached the maximum last injection interval of 16 weeks either with 2-or 4-week adjustments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fixed-interval bevacizumab every 4-6 weeks with no OCT monitoring and variable dosing regimens of intravitreal bevacizumab based on OCT monitoring both result in similar improvement in visual acuity and central macular thickness, but with more injections (9.5 vs. 3.8 injections during 1 year follow up) in the fixed treatment group [7,8]. Thus, an ideal treatment schedule for the COVID-19 era, which minimizes the number of visits while showing non-inferior visual outcome is TER [9,10].…”
Section: Rescheduling Of Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon inactive disease, patients in the latter group received an injection, and the Optimizing Anti-VEGF Treatment Outcomes for Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration treatment interval was extended by 2 weeks at a time for a maximum interval of 12 weeks. 70,71 Recurrence of disease activity was designated by intraretinal or subretinal fluid on OCT. At 2 years, the monthly and treat-and-extend groups did not differ significantly in improvements of VA (+10.5 and +8.7 letters) or CRT (-117 and -118 µm). Significantly more injections were given to patients treated monthly (25.5) compared with the alternate regimen (18.6; P < 0.001).…”
Section: Optimizing Anti-vegf Treatment Outcomes For Patients With Nementioning
confidence: 99%
“…68 No cases of this event were reported in the TREX-AMD trial, and 1 of the 40 patients in the ATLAS trial had culture-positive endophthalmitis. 71 The recently published results from the large TREND trial showed that the treat-and-extend regimen of 0.5 mg ranibizumab was noninferior to monthly ranibizumab dosing with a least squares mean BCVA change from baseline of 6.2 and 8.1 letters, respectively. These BCVA changes occurred within 6 months of treatment and were stable in both arms.…”
Section: Optimizing Anti-vegf Treatment Outcomes For Patients With Nementioning
confidence: 99%