2006
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-1517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Trial of the Early Start Program of Home Visitation: Parent and Family Outcomes

Abstract: This evaluation suggested that the Early Start program failed to lead to parent- and family-related benefits. This absence of benefit for parent/family outcomes is contrasted with the benefits found previously for child-related outcomes, including child health, preschool education, child abuse and neglect, parenting, and behavioral adjustment. This comparison suggests that home visitation programs may provide benefits for child-related outcomes in the absence of parent- or family-related outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13,24 Early Start demonstrated favorable effects on 3 outcomes, including percentage who received well-child visits and dental service. [25][26][27] HFA had favorable results for 4 health care outcomes, such as the number of well-child visits and whether the child had health insurance. [28][29][30][31] HFA had an unfavorable effect on the number of pediatric emergency department (ED) visits.…”
Section: Health Care Coverage and Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,24 Early Start demonstrated favorable effects on 3 outcomes, including percentage who received well-child visits and dental service. [25][26][27] HFA had favorable results for 4 health care outcomes, such as the number of well-child visits and whether the child had health insurance. [28][29][30][31] HFA had an unfavorable effect on the number of pediatric emergency department (ED) visits.…”
Section: Health Care Coverage and Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 In New Zealand, Scotland, and other countries, recent development of home-visiting efforts have replicated American models, thus indicating that the promise seen in this country with home visiting is envisioned beyond our shores. 13 " [Home-visiting] programs that succeed in helping the children and families who live in the shadows are intensive and comprehensive, flexible, and staffed by professionals with the time and skills to establish solid relationships with their clients. Intensive medical care for fragile newborn or aged patients who are barely clinging to life, costly though it may be, encounters no general resistance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seven best performing programmes were (in order of cost-effectiveness): the Child and Youth Program conducted in Baltimore with low income women involving lay visits (with professional support) until age 2 (program 19),15 an Australian home visiting programme for high risk young teenage mothers aged less than 18 years (program 13),16 the Special Families Care Project Minnesota, an intensive early intervention programme for mothers at high risk of abusing their infants (program 1),17 18 the Nurse Home Visiting Program in Denver Colorado that used nurse visitors (program 16a),19 20 the New Zealand Early Start programme for low income, welfare dependent women using nurses or social workers (program 14)21 22 and the Olds Nurse Family Partnership programme conducted in Elmira, New York involving nurses visiting prenatally and until age 2 years (programs 24a, 24b) 23–30…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%