Abstract:Objective: To determine whether extremely low birth weight infants who receive enteral sterile water have a reduction in treated patent ductus arteriosus or death by 28 days compared to infants with routine management.Study Design: A total of 214 infants were enrolled and randomized by 36 h of age to receive up to 50 ml kg À1 per day of enteral sterile water (n ¼ 109) for 7 days or routine fluid management (n ¼ 104). Patent ductus arteriosus treatment was defined as either indomethacin treatment or surgical li… Show more
“…On average, the WHO sample children were taller than the CDC sample children 10. Both Japanese breastfed children and Japanese growth charts children were shorter than the WHO growth standards children 18.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…When the WHO weight-for-age curves were compared with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) ones, the median weight was greater for the CDC samples than for the WHO samples except during the first 6 months 10. Overall, the CDC sample children are heavier than the WHO sample children, which implies that the prevalence of underweight (<−2 SD) would be higher when using the CDC charts than when using the WHO charts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, a study in Hong Kong found that the centre of weight for age distribution of the breastfed Chinese children was similar to the one of the WHO growth standards reference population 14. The difference in underweight prevalence of these Chinese children between the China growth charts and the WHO growth standards could be due to the sample selection of children: (1) different type of feeding modes in the two standards (breastfeeding is not a criterion for the China growth reference) 10 15. According to the National Health Survey 2008 in China, the exclusive breastfeeding rate for 0–6-month-old infants was only 27.6%, which was even lower in urban areas (15.8%); only 37% of children aged 12–15 months continued breastfeeding nationwide and 15.5% of urban children continued breastfeeding.…”
ObjectivesTo compare the difference between the China growth reference and the WHO growth standards in assessing malnutrition of children under 5 years.SettingsThe households selected from 31 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities in mainland China (except Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao).ParticipantsHouseholds were selected by using a stratified, multistage probability cluster sampling. Children under 5 years of age in the selected households were recruited (n=15 886).Primary and secondary outcome measuresUnderweight, stunting, wasting, overweight and obesity.ResultsAccording to the China growth reference, the prevalence of underweight (8.7% vs 4.8%), stunting (17.2% vs 16.1%) and wasting (4.4% vs 3%) was significantly higher than that based on the WHO growth standards, respectively (p<0.001); the prevalence of overweight was lower than that based on the WHO growth standards (9.4% vs 10.2%, p<0.001). In most cases, the prevalence of undernutrition assessed by using the China growth reference was significantly higher. However, the prevalence of overweight was significantly lower by using China charts for boys aged 3–4, 6, 8, 10, 12–18 and 24 months.ConclusionsThe WHO growth standards could be more conservative in undernutrition estimation and more applicable for international comparison for Chinese children. Future researches are warranted for using the WHO growth standards within those countries with local growth charts when there are distinct differences between the two.
“…On average, the WHO sample children were taller than the CDC sample children 10. Both Japanese breastfed children and Japanese growth charts children were shorter than the WHO growth standards children 18.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…When the WHO weight-for-age curves were compared with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) ones, the median weight was greater for the CDC samples than for the WHO samples except during the first 6 months 10. Overall, the CDC sample children are heavier than the WHO sample children, which implies that the prevalence of underweight (<−2 SD) would be higher when using the CDC charts than when using the WHO charts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, a study in Hong Kong found that the centre of weight for age distribution of the breastfed Chinese children was similar to the one of the WHO growth standards reference population 14. The difference in underweight prevalence of these Chinese children between the China growth charts and the WHO growth standards could be due to the sample selection of children: (1) different type of feeding modes in the two standards (breastfeeding is not a criterion for the China growth reference) 10 15. According to the National Health Survey 2008 in China, the exclusive breastfeeding rate for 0–6-month-old infants was only 27.6%, which was even lower in urban areas (15.8%); only 37% of children aged 12–15 months continued breastfeeding nationwide and 15.5% of urban children continued breastfeeding.…”
ObjectivesTo compare the difference between the China growth reference and the WHO growth standards in assessing malnutrition of children under 5 years.SettingsThe households selected from 31 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities in mainland China (except Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao).ParticipantsHouseholds were selected by using a stratified, multistage probability cluster sampling. Children under 5 years of age in the selected households were recruited (n=15 886).Primary and secondary outcome measuresUnderweight, stunting, wasting, overweight and obesity.ResultsAccording to the China growth reference, the prevalence of underweight (8.7% vs 4.8%), stunting (17.2% vs 16.1%) and wasting (4.4% vs 3%) was significantly higher than that based on the WHO growth standards, respectively (p<0.001); the prevalence of overweight was lower than that based on the WHO growth standards (9.4% vs 10.2%, p<0.001). In most cases, the prevalence of undernutrition assessed by using the China growth reference was significantly higher. However, the prevalence of overweight was significantly lower by using China charts for boys aged 3–4, 6, 8, 10, 12–18 and 24 months.ConclusionsThe WHO growth standards could be more conservative in undernutrition estimation and more applicable for international comparison for Chinese children. Future researches are warranted for using the WHO growth standards within those countries with local growth charts when there are distinct differences between the two.
“…A randomised controlled trial in Nepal found that children 6-8 years old whose mothers received vitamin A, iron, zinc and folic acid supplements during pregnancy from~11 weeks of gestation had significantly greater height, smaller triceps skinfold thickness, subscapular skinfold thickness and arm fat area than those in the control group whose mothers were receiving vitamin A only. However, groups receiving folate alone, folate plus iron or a multiple micronutrient supplement (with the same amount of iron, zinc and folate) did not show similar results (Stewart et al 2009). A longitudinal cohort in India investigated the association between vitamin B 12 and folate status in pregnant women at 18 weeks and 28 weeks of gestation and adiposity and insulin resistance of their children at 6 years of age (Yajnik et al 2008).…”
Section: Micronutrient Intake During Pregnancy and Obesity In Later Lifementioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, groups receiving folate alone, folate plus iron or a multiple micronutrient supplement (with the same amount of iron, zinc and folate) did not show similar results (Stewart et al . ). A longitudinal cohort in India investigated the association between vitamin B 12 and folate status in pregnant women at 18 weeks and 28 weeks of gestation and adiposity and insulin resistance of their children at 6 years of age (Yajnik et al .…”
Section: Prenatal Nutrition and Obesity In Later Lifementioning
Concerns about the increasing rates of obesity in developing countries have led many policy makers to question the impacts of maternal and early child nutrition on risk of later obesity. The purposes of the review are to summarise the studies on the associations between nutrition during pregnancy and infant feeding practices with later obesity from childhood through adulthood and to identify potential ways for preventing obesity in developing countries. As few studies were identified in developing countries, key studies in developed countries were included in the review.Poor prenatal dietary intakes of energy, protein and micronutrients were shown to be associated with increased risk of adult obesity in offspring. Female offspring seem to be more vulnerable than male offspring when their mothers receive insufficient energy during pregnancy.By influencing birthweight, optimal prenatal nutrition might reduce the risk of obesity in adults. While normal birthweights (2500-3999 g) were associated with higher body mass index (BMI) as adults, they generally were associated with higher fat-free mass and lower fat mass compared with low birthweights (<2500 g). Low birthweight was associated with higher risk of metabolic syndrome and central obesity in adults.Breastfeeding and timely introduction of complementary foods were shown to protect against obesity later in life in observational studies. High-protein intake during early childhood however was associated with higher body fat mass and obesity in adulthood.In developed countries, increased weight gain during the first 2 years of life was associated with a higher BMI in adulthood. However, recent studies in developing countries showed that higher BMI was more related to greater lean body mass than fat mass. It appears that increased length at 2 years of age was positively associated with height, weight and fat-free mass, and was only weakly associated with fat mass.The protective associations between breastfeeding and obesity may differ in developing countries compared to developed countries because many studies in developed countries used formula feeding as a control. Future research on the relationship between breastfeeding, timely introduction of complementary feeding or rapid weight gain and obesity are warranted in developing countries.The focus of interventions to reduce risk of obesity in later life in developing countries could include:1. improving maternal nutritional status during pregnancy to reduce low birthweight; 2. enhancing breastfeeding (including durations of exclusive and total breastfeeding); 3. timely introduction of high-quality complementary foods (containing micronutrients and essential fats) but not excessive in protein; 4. further evidence is needed to understand the extent of weight gain and length gain during early childhood are related to body composition in later life.
Background: There are no national reference charts in Iran for children aged under five. This study aimed to develop representative growth reference charts of height, weight, and BMI for children aged 2-5 years in Isfahan, Iran, and to compare them with the WHO reference curves. Results: This population-based study has a combination of longitudinal and cross-sectional design. It included 1325 and 761 healthy children, who were born between 2002 and 2015 in Isfahan, central Iran, in longitudinal and crosssectional phases. Expert health care providers measured the height and weight of children in health centers. The lambda-mu-sigma method was used to construct the age-and sex-specific growth charts of anthropometric measures. The study sample comprised 1029 boys and 1057 girls. The centiles of height, weight, and BMI of boys were higher than that of girls in all age groups. The weight patterns of studied children were close to those of the WHO references in the lower percentiles. However, our study children, especially girls, were lighter compared with WHO standards based on the middle and upper percentiles of the weight distribution. Compared with WHO standards, boys of our study were taller especially at older ages. The percentiles of the BMI for our study samples were considerably lower than WHO standards. Conclusion: There are differences between our local growth charts for weight, height, and BMI with WHO standards. The local growth standards could be more precise for assessing growth problems in local and national settings. Due to notable differences between our results with WHO standards, future studies are warranted for constructing nationwide growth charts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.