2016
DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2016(11)06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized trial of radiofrequency ablation versus conventional surgery for superficial venous insufficiency: if you don't tell, they won't know

Abstract: OBJECTIVES:This study compared radiofrequency ablation versus conventional surgery in patients who had not undergone previous treatment for bilateral great saphenous vein insufficiency, with each patient serving as his own control.METHOD:This was a randomized controlled trial that included 18 patients and was carried out between November 2013 and May 2015. Each of the lower limbs of each patient was randomly assigned to undergo either radiofrequency ablation or conventional surgery. Clinical features (hyperpig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mendes CA et al; conducted a randomized controlled trial that included 18 patients and was carried out between November 2013 and May 2015. 9 Each of the lower limbs of each patient was randomly assigned to undergo either radiofrequency ablation or conventional surgery. Clinical features (hyperpigmentation, hematoma, aesthetics, pain, skin burn, nerve injury, and thrombophlebitis) were evaluated at one week, one month, and six months postoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mendes CA et al; conducted a randomized controlled trial that included 18 patients and was carried out between November 2013 and May 2015. 9 Each of the lower limbs of each patient was randomly assigned to undergo either radiofrequency ablation or conventional surgery. Clinical features (hyperpigmentation, hematoma, aesthetics, pain, skin burn, nerve injury, and thrombophlebitis) were evaluated at one week, one month, and six months postoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 The sapheno-femoral junction insuffi ciency and/or refl ux disease of the VSM are blamed for superfi cial venous refl ux phenomenon in most instances. 12 Various mechanisms are accused in the formation of varicose veins. Insuffi cient valves promoting vein dilation, venous stasis, and eventually venous hypertension are known to be the principle mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of conventional varicose surgery and its low recurrence rates are undeniable, 15,16 which makes this technique the gold standard for varicose vein treatment. Despite the increase in the use of modern techniques of venous thermal ablation and the fact that its effectiveness is comparable to conventional surgery, Mendes et al 17 demonstrated, in a randomized study, that if patients are not told the technique used, they cannot differentiate the conventional surgery from the radiofrequency ablation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%