Randomized study of bipolar vessel sealing system versus conventional suture ligature for vaginal hysterectomy

Silva-Filho, Agnaldo L.; Rodrigues, A. N.; Monteiro, Marilene Vale de Castro; Rosa, Darley Gonçalves da; Silva, Yaline Márcia Batista Pereira e; Werneck, Rogéria Andrade; Bavoso, Nádia; Triginelli, Sérgio A.

doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.03.014

Cited by 45 publications

(46 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Bogani et al pointed out that the patient BMI is directly proportional to the rate of complications due to hysterectomy. The higher intraoperative complication rates in our study and control groups compared with those reported in previously published studies could be explained by these factors [9,12,[14][15][16][17].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 50%

“…Although there are numerous papers on the technique of sealing vessels using bipolar electrosurgical device during VH also in obese patients, previous studies comparing the two techniques excluded or did not report specifically findings regarding morbidly obese patients. [11,[14][15][16][17]. There is no reliable information regarding the impact of EBVS system on surgical success in morbidly obese patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Safety and efficacy of using advanced electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy in morbidly obese patients: a retrospective cohort analysis

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To assess the safety and efficacy of electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy in morbidly obese patients. Material and methods:A total of 105 morbidly obese patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy due to benign gynecologic pathologies between January 2010 and April 2017 were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether conventional suture ligation technique (n = 64) or electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing (n = 41) were used during vaginal hysterectomy. The surgical procedure was performed with the same technique in both study groups. The primary outcomes were duration of surgery and estimated blood loss. The secondary outcomes were intra-operative complications and post-operative complications. Results:The duration of surgery and estimated blood loss in the vessel sealing group was significantly less than in the conventional suture group (p < 0.05). No significant difference was present between the two groups in the rate of intra-operative and post-operative complications. Conclusions:The primary outcome of our study is that the EBVS system can be used equally and even more effectively in some aspects; and as safe an alternative approach to conventional suture ligation technique during vaginal hysterectomies performed specifically on morbidly obese patients with reduced operation times and blood loss, and without increasing the complication rates.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 50%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Safety and efficacy of using advanced electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy in morbidly obese patients: a retrospective cohort analysis

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Third, we used electrosurgical devices to coagulate and dissect tissues during LH; whereas VH was performed using clamps, scissors, and tying knots, according to the traditional vaginal techniques. Regarding this latter possible explanation, some studies have consistently shown how the implementation of electrosurgical technology in vaginal surgery resulted in a signifi cant reduction of postoperative pain [22,23]. Our study reveals that TLH is associated with less postoperative pain when compared with VH overall.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 50%

The comparison of postoperative pain: total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy

Choi

Kim

Park

2012

Korean J Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…These observations were conforming with those of Lewy et al (68.9 ml sealer group versus 126.7 ml in suture group), Elhao et al (230ml in sealer group versus 360ml in suture group), Silva Fiho et al (84±5.9 ml in sealer versus 136.898 ml in suture group). 16,21,22 Relatively more number of women had blood loss >100 ml in suture group i.e. 34 out of 86 versus 9 out of 88 patients in the sealer group in the study by Zubke et al 20 Even though most studies noted this difference in blood loss, studies of Hefni et al and Cronje and de Coning did not find any significant difference in blood loss between the two group of patients.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

Suture versus vessel sealer in vaginal hysterectomy: an observational study

Upadhyay

Aditya

Gupta

et al. 2017

Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Vaginal route is considered to be the method of choice for removal of uterus and, in the absence of gross pelvic disease, can be carried out in most patients. Recent studies have shown that less than one-third of hysterectomies are performed vaginally. This could be due to technical difficulties occurring while operating in the narrow surgical field. This study was taken up to find out the easier alternatives in securing pedicles by using Electrosurgical Bipolar Vessel Sealer in Vaginal Hysterectomy.Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, BRD Medical College, Gorakhpur over a period of one year i.e. July 15 to June 16. A total of 62 patients posted for vaginal hysterectomy for benign conditions were enrolled after informed consent. Results were recorded under headings of procedure time (min), blood loss (ml), major intra-operative complications and post operative complications, post-operative pain (on VAS) and duration of hospital stay.Results: Mean procedure time in suture method was found to be 55.66min, whereas, in sealer group it was 27.75 min. Mean blood loss in the sealer group was 83.78ml, while, in suture group it was 156.62ml. Mean pain score on Visual Analogue Scale on POD 1 was 8.44±1.1522 for suture group and 6±1.325 for sealer group. Mean pain score on POD2 in sealer group was 3.48±1.325 and in the suture group it was 5.31±1.754 (P<0.0001). Mean pain score on POD3 in suture group 2.82±0.508, in sealer group it was 1.0909±0.608 (P<0.0001). Pain scores, thereafter, did not differ significantly. Mean length of stay in suture group is 10.71 days (suture group) versus 5.3 days (sealer group). Blood loss >200ml was observed in 29.03% of suture cases, none in the sealer group (P-value .0006). Labial burn occurred in 2 out of 32patients in sealer group.Conclusions: From above study, we conclude that bipolar vessel sealer has shown a significant reduction in intra-operative blood loss, procedure time, immediate post-operative pain (POD1,2&3), mean length of stay in hospital, major intra-operative blood loss>200ml which was found in significant number of cases in suture group.

show abstract

Randomized study of bipolar vessel sealing system versus conventional suture ligature for vaginal hysterectomy

Cited by 45 publications

References 16 publications

Safety and efficacy of using advanced electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy in morbidly obese patients: a retrospective cohort analysis

Safety and efficacy of using advanced electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy in morbidly obese patients: a retrospective cohort analysis

The comparison of postoperative pain: total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy

Suture versus vessel sealer in vaginal hysterectomy: an observational study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About