Randomized Single-Center Study of Effectiveness and Safety of a Resorbable Lysine-Based Urethane Adhesive for a Drain-Free Closure of the Abdominal Donor Site in a DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction Procedure

Fertsch, Sonia; Michalak, Michał; Andree, Christoph; Munder, B; Hagouan, M; Schulz, Tino; Stambera, Peter; Steammler, Katinka; Grueter, Lukas; Kornetka, Julia; Wolter, A

doi:10.1080/08941939.2022.2046215

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…• Different techniques for dissection /electrocautery [66][67][68] • Different techniques for fat transfer [69] Donor site management • Different regimes for abdominal closure after abdominally based flap [70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77] • Different regimes for back closure after latissimus dorsi harvest [78][79][80][81][82]…”

Section: Surgical Details Valid For Several Categories Of Breast Reco...mentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of randomised controlled trials in breast reconstruction

Hansson,

Larsson,

Uusimäki

et al. 2024

JPHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: For preference sensitive treatments, such as breast reconstructions, there are barriers to conducting randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The primary aims of this systematic review were to investigate what type of research questions are explored by RCTs in breast reconstruction, where have they been performed and where have they been published, and to thematise the research questions and thus create an overview of the state of the research field. Methods: Randomised controlled trials investigating any aspect of breast reconstructions were included. The PubMed database was searched with a pre-defined search string. Inclusion and data abstraction was performed in a pre-defined standardised fashion. For the purpose of this study, we defined key issues as comparison of categories of breast reconstruction and comparison of immediate and delayed breast reconstruction, when the thematisation was done. Results: A total of 419 abstracts were retrieved from the search. Of the 419, 310 were excluded as they were not RCTs concerning some aspect of breast reconstruction, which left us with 110 abstracts to be included in the study. The research questions of the included studies could more or less be divided into seven different themes inclusive of 2 key issues: Other issues – comparison of different categories of breast reconstruction, comparison of immediate and delayed breast reconstruction, surgical details within a category of breast reconstruction, surgical details valid for several categories of breast reconstruction, donor site management, anaesthetics, and non-surgical details. Only five studies compared key issues, and they all illustrate the challenges with RCTs in breast reconstruction. Conclusions: A total of 110 publications based on RCTs in breast reconstruction have been published. Seven themes of research questions could be identified. Only five studies have explored the key issues. Better scientific evidence is needed for the key issues in breast reconstruction, for example by implementing a new study design in the field.

show abstract