2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3758(00)00097-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized response revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the optimum SSR3 model is always more efficient than the additive and multiplicative models and, consequently from Equations (18) and (19), also than the original model by Saha. Nevertheless, apart from the aforementioned analytical comparisons, we observe that the model can perform better than the additive and multiplicative models also for values of the constant ϕ which are different from the optimum ϕ 0 .…”
Section: Srr3 Model Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the optimum SSR3 model is always more efficient than the additive and multiplicative models and, consequently from Equations (18) and (19), also than the original model by Saha. Nevertheless, apart from the aforementioned analytical comparisons, we observe that the model can perform better than the additive and multiplicative models also for values of the constant ϕ which are different from the optimum ϕ 0 .…”
Section: Srr3 Model Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Bar-Lev et al [2] generalized Eichhorn and Hayre's SRR device by introducing a design parameter which is used for randomizing the responses. Further developments on SRR models can be found in [8,[13][14][15][16][17]19,20,24,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An excellent exposition of modifications on RR techniques and other related works could be referred to Chaudhuri and Mukerjee [6]. Some resent developments are Bhargava and Singh [1], Chua and Tsui [7], Padmawar and Vijayan [12], Singh et al [14], Chang and Huang [2], Chaudhuri [5], Singh et al [13], Huang [10], and Chang et al [3,4], etc. In particular, to quantify the sensitivity level for certain items of inquiry in practice, Gupta et al [9] first shown how an estimator may be developed on the quantitative characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of improvements of RR sampling have been suggested in the literature; see Chaudhuri and Mukerjee [4] for a review. Some recent developments included Bhargava and Singh [1], Chang and Huang [2], Chaudhuri [3], Christofides [5], Chua and Tsui [6], Huang [9], Mahmood et al [10], Mangat et al [11], Padmawar and Vijayan [12], Singh [13], and Singh et al [14], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%