2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1806.04032
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized reference models for temporal networks

Abstract: Fundamental definitions and general results A. Temporal network B. Randomized reference model C. Combining microcanonical randomized reference models III. Features of temporal networks A. Notation for features of instant-event networks IV. Shuffling methods A. Link and timeline shufflings B. Sequence and snapshot shufflings V. Classifying randomized reference models A. Naming convention B. Applying instant-event shufflings to temporal networks with event durations C. The basic instant-event and event shuffling… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surrogate model approach is a statistical proof-by-contradiction method used for investigating specific features and correlations in empirical data sets. It is based on testing composite null hypotheses on data sets that are derived from the empirical data using Monte Carlo methods [44,45,49,50]. A variety of time series [48,[58][59][60] and network data sets [48,[61][62][63] have been analyzed using surrogate models.…”
Section: Surrogate Model Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The surrogate model approach is a statistical proof-by-contradiction method used for investigating specific features and correlations in empirical data sets. It is based on testing composite null hypotheses on data sets that are derived from the empirical data using Monte Carlo methods [44,45,49,50]. A variety of time series [48,[58][59][60] and network data sets [48,[61][62][63] have been analyzed using surrogate models.…”
Section: Surrogate Model Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large ensemble of 5000 realizations is computed for each surrogate model, to reduce the influence of statistical fluctuations. We use the canonical naming convention put forward in [44] to describe the surrogate models M associated with the null hypotheses H 0 . Surrogate models are thus defined by the quantities they conserve with respect to the original empirical data.…”
Section: Surrogate Model Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That is, different results of epidemic spreading associated with non-Poissonian IET statistics may owe in large part to whether the structure of the metapopulation network plays a significant role (which would yield heavier-tailed IET distributions) or the population is sufficiently wellmixed (which would yield an exponential IET distribution). The effects of IET statistics other than their heavy-tailed distributions [2,3,82] on epidemic and other dynamical processes may also be due to the underlying metapopulation network. Reexamining the role of IETs in contagion and other dynamical processes from the viewpoint of metapopulation networks warrants future work.…”
Section: Fig 3 CV Of Iet For Various Metapopulation Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, panel (c) of both figures shows the z-scores trends assessing the reliability of ∆-Conformity trends. Z-scores are obtained by comparing point by point the ∆-Conformity score of the original graph to a null distribution of 200 rewired networks using a configuration model [6,18]; We use the following formula for the comparison:…”
Section: /20mentioning
confidence: 99%