2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03526-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized prospective trial of fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for bevacizumab-resistant high-grade glioma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
21
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[21] Another randomized trial was recently conducted by Henry Ford Hospital comparing bevacizumab alone to bevacizumab with fractionated radiosurgery to 32 Gy/4 fractions with similar clinical and toxicity outcomes. [22] These studies appear to con rm the safety pro le and potential to delay disease progression for modestly-dosed hypofractionated reirradiation regimens. This strategy may be particularly useful for high-grade recurrences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…[21] Another randomized trial was recently conducted by Henry Ford Hospital comparing bevacizumab alone to bevacizumab with fractionated radiosurgery to 32 Gy/4 fractions with similar clinical and toxicity outcomes. [22] These studies appear to con rm the safety pro le and potential to delay disease progression for modestly-dosed hypofractionated reirradiation regimens. This strategy may be particularly useful for high-grade recurrences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…These results suggest that ReRT/Bev prolongs PFS but does not have survival bene ts compared to Bev alone for Bev-naïve patients with recurrence [15]. Bergman et al reported that ReRT/Bev-based chemotherapy also increased PFS, and that it tended to prolong OS compared to Bev-based chemotherapy alone for patients with progression after Bev [16]. Although the optimal timing of reirradiation before and after Bev remains unclear, based on our results and those of Bergman, differing reirradiation after Bev might be a preferred option to minimise the potential risk of radiation necrosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A few studies have investigated the outcomes of ReRT/Bev for patients with high-grade gliomas that progressed after Bev (Table 4) [6,7,11,[16][17][18][19]. The median survival times after ReRT/Bev ranged from 3.3 to 14.7 months, and the median PFS times ranged from 2.6 to 6. and an increased trend in OS (7.3 vs 4.8 months; p = 0.11); therefore, they concluded that FSRT with Bevbased chemotherapy might be a valuable option for extending PFS and improving local control [16]. Our results indicating that the median OS and PFS were 6.1 and 3.8 months, respectively, are comparable to those of previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations