Abstract:Objective
To test the effects of inhaled ipratropium on clinical outcomes of critical asthma in the first randomized trial of this adjunctive therapy in critically ill children.
Design
Pilot, placebo‐controlled, double‐blinded, and randomized‐controlled trial
Patients
Thirty children (15 per group) with critical asthma receiving high‐intensity albuterol per a standardized pathway utilizing objective assessments to wean patients to less frequent albuterol administration.
Interventions
Subjects were randomized t… Show more
“…Previous studies [16][17][18] concentrate on the impact of the addition of IB in hospital length of stay, proving that IB does not reduce days of hospital admission. However, there is no previous literature concerning its impact on the length of stay at the PED.…”
INTRODUCTION: The treatment of moderate asthmatic exacerbations
in children is controversial, specifically concerning whether
ipratropium bromide (IB) should be combined with beta-2-short agonist
and corticosteroids. In 2021, in our hospital, the use of IB was
discontinued in moderate asthma exacerbation in our Pediatric Emergency
Department (PED). OBJECTIVE: Compare the admission rate,
average length of stay in the PED, Pulmonary Score (PS) at discharge,
and revisits before and after discontinuing the use of IB in moderate
asthmatic exacerbations. METHODS: single-center, retrospective,
cohort study. Patients from 6 to 16 years who attended the PED with
moderate asthmatic crisis (Pulmonary Score [PS]: 4-6) were included.
Medical records were consulted in two periods: Cohort 1 (children
received inhaled salbutamol, ipratropium bromide (IB) and systemic
glucocorticoids, 01/09/2018-01/09/2019) and Cohort 2 (treatment with
salbutamol and systemic glucocorticoids, 01/09/2021-01/09/2022) The
relationship between the use of IB and the outcome variables was
analyzed: admission rate and revisits (Chi-square), PED length of stay
and PS score at discharge (Student’s T test). Multivariable analysis was
performed to evaluate the potential association between variables and
predictive factors for admission. RESULTS: 351 patients were
included: 174 (49.6%) in Cohort 1 and 177 (50.4%) in Cohort 2. IB was
not associated with admission rate (15 [8.6%] in Cohort 1 vs 7
[4%] in Cohort 2; p0.07), median stay in the PED (2.33hours
[SD:0.66] vs 2,46 hours [SD:0.85], p0.207), Pulmonary Score at
discharge (0,78 [SD:0.85] vs 0,92 [SD:0.79]; p0.137) nor
revisits (25 [14,5%] vs 14 [7,9%]; p0.052); p0.207).
CONCLUSION: IB does not seem useful in moderate asthmatic
exacerbations.
“…Previous studies [16][17][18] concentrate on the impact of the addition of IB in hospital length of stay, proving that IB does not reduce days of hospital admission. However, there is no previous literature concerning its impact on the length of stay at the PED.…”
INTRODUCTION: The treatment of moderate asthmatic exacerbations
in children is controversial, specifically concerning whether
ipratropium bromide (IB) should be combined with beta-2-short agonist
and corticosteroids. In 2021, in our hospital, the use of IB was
discontinued in moderate asthma exacerbation in our Pediatric Emergency
Department (PED). OBJECTIVE: Compare the admission rate,
average length of stay in the PED, Pulmonary Score (PS) at discharge,
and revisits before and after discontinuing the use of IB in moderate
asthmatic exacerbations. METHODS: single-center, retrospective,
cohort study. Patients from 6 to 16 years who attended the PED with
moderate asthmatic crisis (Pulmonary Score [PS]: 4-6) were included.
Medical records were consulted in two periods: Cohort 1 (children
received inhaled salbutamol, ipratropium bromide (IB) and systemic
glucocorticoids, 01/09/2018-01/09/2019) and Cohort 2 (treatment with
salbutamol and systemic glucocorticoids, 01/09/2021-01/09/2022) The
relationship between the use of IB and the outcome variables was
analyzed: admission rate and revisits (Chi-square), PED length of stay
and PS score at discharge (Student’s T test). Multivariable analysis was
performed to evaluate the potential association between variables and
predictive factors for admission. RESULTS: 351 patients were
included: 174 (49.6%) in Cohort 1 and 177 (50.4%) in Cohort 2. IB was
not associated with admission rate (15 [8.6%] in Cohort 1 vs 7
[4%] in Cohort 2; p0.07), median stay in the PED (2.33hours
[SD:0.66] vs 2,46 hours [SD:0.85], p0.207), Pulmonary Score at
discharge (0,78 [SD:0.85] vs 0,92 [SD:0.79]; p0.137) nor
revisits (25 [14,5%] vs 14 [7,9%]; p0.052); p0.207).
CONCLUSION: IB does not seem useful in moderate asthmatic
exacerbations.
“…10 One single-center, double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of 30 children requiring PICU admission for either continuous or hourly albuterol treatments addressed this question. 11 Investigators found no significant difference in duration of high-intensity albuterol, PICU length-of-stay, or hospital length-of-stay between those who continued to receive ipratropium bromide in the PICU and those who did not. This finding is consistent with previous studies analyzing ipratropium bromide given to asthmatic children hospitalized in the general ward.…”
Section: Asthma Exacerbations and Severe Asthmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drug ipratropium bromide has been shown to decrease rates of hospitalization in children with asthma when given alongside systemic steroids and inhaled beta‐agonists in the emergency department, yet there have been no trials assessing the effect of ipratropium bromide use in critically ill asthmatics admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) 10 . One single‐center, double‐blinded, randomized, controlled trial of 30 children requiring PICU admission for either continuous or hourly albuterol treatments addressed this question 11 . Investigators found no significant difference in duration of high‐intensity albuterol, PICU length‐of‐stay, or hospital length‐of‐stay between those who continued to receive ipratropium bromide in the PICU and those who did not.…”
Section: Asthma Exacerbations and Severe Asthmamentioning
Pediatric asthma is a heterogeneous and common chronic condition with significant morbidity and burden on the healthcare system. Despite advances in the field, the disease has proven to be increasingly complex to diagnose and management strategies are constantly evolving. Studies from 2020 have advanced the field even further, particularly with regard to new methods of diagnosis and monitoring, treatment of severe asthma, modifiable risk factors like exercise and obesity, aerosol delivery, and viral respiratory infections contributing to the development of asthma. Continued studies are needed to improve our care for children with asthma and we look forward to future advances. This article is part of our 2020 "Year in Review" series, in which we summarize publications in major topic areas, in the context of selected literature from other journals relevant to our discipline.
K E Y W O R D Saerosol biology, asthma and early wheeze, epidemiology, special dimensions of pulmonary medicine Asthma is a common chronic illness in the pediatric population that can be difficult to both diagnose and treat effectively. Research in 2020 has advanced the field of pediatric asthma within the domains of diagnostic testing and monitoring, disease management, severe asthma and exacerbations, aerosol delivery, lifestyle and social determinants of health, and the effect of early viral infections. This article is part of our 2020 "Year in Review" series, in which we summarize publications in major topic areas, in the context of selected literature from other journals relevant to our discipline.
“…It is in this environment that a study such as Dr. Murphy's is impressively conducted 6 . Performing clinical trials of status asthmaticus in children at a single center requires a sustained effort over several asthma seasons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this issue of Pediatric Pulmonology , Murphy et al 6 conducted a randomized double‐blinded placebo‐controlled trial of ipratropium in children with critical asthma. Children were randomized to receive either ipratropium or placebo until they had been weaned to intermittent albuterol therapy every 2 h. This study, which stretched over 3 years, found no improvement in outcomes in the group that received ipratropium including similar hospital and PICU length of stay and similar time until spaced to every 2‐h albuterol.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.