2010
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.24.4244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Phase III Trial of Ixabepilone Plus Capecitabine Versus Capecitabine in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With an Anthracycline and a Taxane

Abstract: This study confirmed a previous trial demonstrating improved PFS and response for the ixabepilone-capecitabine combination compared with capecitabine alone, although this did not result in improved survival.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
158
1
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
9
158
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Grade 3/4 neutropenia was more common in the combination arm (68% vs. 11% and 73% vs. 9%), as well as grade 3/4 leukopenia (57% vs. 6% and 63% vs. 7%), anemia (10% vs. 4% and 5% vs. 4%), and thrombocytopenia (8% vs. 4% and 6% vs. 3%) [26,27] Similarly, grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy was more common in the combination arm (23% vs. 0% and 25% vs. 1%) [26] (2129}.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Grade 3/4 neutropenia was more common in the combination arm (68% vs. 11% and 73% vs. 9%), as well as grade 3/4 leukopenia (57% vs. 6% and 63% vs. 7%), anemia (10% vs. 4% and 5% vs. 4%), and thrombocytopenia (8% vs. 4% and 6% vs. 3%) [26,27] Similarly, grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy was more common in the combination arm (23% vs. 0% and 25% vs. 1%) [26] (2129}.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (54%), leukopenia (49%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (14%), fatigue/asthenia (14%), anemia (8%), thrombocytopenia (8%), myalgia/arthralgia (8%), and stomatitis/mucositis (7%) [25] . In 2 phase 3 trials comparing ixabepilone plus capecitabine with capecitabine monotherapy in patients with locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer who were pretreated with taxanes and anthracyclines (one study included 752 patients and the other 1,221 patients), the ixabepilone/capecitabine combination significantly improved ORR (35% vs. 14% and 43% vs. 29%, P <0.0001 for both) and median PFS (5.8 vs. 4.2 months; P = 0.0003 and 6.2 vs. 4.2 months; P = 0.0005, respectively) [26,27] . In both studies, the combination was not associated with a statistically significant improvement in OS (12.9 vs. 11.1 months; P = 0.19 and 16.4 vs. 15.6 months; P = 0.1162) [23,27] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ixabepilone has been evaluated as a single agent 56 and in combination with capecitabine in patients previously treated with anthracycline and taxane therapy [87][88][89] . A phase iii trial noted that, compared with capecitabine alone, ixabepilone-capecitabine was associated with improved rr (43% vs. 29%) and pfs (6.2 months vs. 4.2 months), but no improvement in os (16.4 months vs. 15.6 months) 88 . Grade 3 or 4 neuropathy occurred in 24% of patients treated with combination therapy, but was reported to be reversible.…”
Section: Ixabepilonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They show a diverse susceptibility profile to P-gp mediated resistance, with ixabepilone the most and sagopilone the less affected by P-gp overexpression [142,143] . Currently, ixabepilone is FDA approved for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and has been tested in phase III clinical trials in combination with capecitabine [144][145][146] .…”
Section: Bypassing P-gp: None Substratesmentioning
confidence: 99%