2004
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djh306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Phase III Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer: 10-Year Follow-Up

Abstract: In 1986, we initiated a multicenter, randomized trial to compare induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil followed by locoregional treatment (surgery and radiotherapy or radiotherapy alone) with locoregional treatment alone in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Here we report the long-term results of the trial. A total of 237 patients with nonmetastatic stage III or IV head and neck carcinoma were randomly assigned to receive four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
86
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
86
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The type of locoregional treatment did not influence the clinical benefits of induction chemotherapy. In a phase III trial conducted by the Gruppo di Studio sui Tumori della Testa e del Collo, patients received locoregional treatment with radiotherapy with or without surgery, either alone or preceded by four 21-day cycles of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin (100 mg/m 2 on day 1) and 5-FU (1,000 mg/m 2 per day, continuous infusion on days 1-5) [6,7]. There was no significant difference in the overall survival rate at 5 years and 10 years between the treatment arms for operable patients.…”
Section: The Potential Of Induction Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of locoregional treatment did not influence the clinical benefits of induction chemotherapy. In a phase III trial conducted by the Gruppo di Studio sui Tumori della Testa e del Collo, patients received locoregional treatment with radiotherapy with or without surgery, either alone or preceded by four 21-day cycles of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin (100 mg/m 2 on day 1) and 5-FU (1,000 mg/m 2 per day, continuous infusion on days 1-5) [6,7]. There was no significant difference in the overall survival rate at 5 years and 10 years between the treatment arms for operable patients.…”
Section: The Potential Of Induction Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the role of induction chemotherapy is not yet clear. Although not the standard of care, induction chemotherapy is used in clinical practice and is thought to be beneficial for reducing the rate of distant metastases (Paccagnella et al, 1994;Lefebvre et al, 1996), increasing organ preservation (Group, 1991;Lefebvre et al, 1996) and survival rates (Paccagnella et al, 1994;Zorat et al, 2004). Combining induction and concomitant chemotherapy with radiation, that is, in a sequential treatment approach, has the potential for improving disease outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are quite similar with a study by Paccagella et.al. 10 a randomized phase 2 Italian study. Two groups were compared: TPF followed by chemoradiotherapy versus chemo radiotherapy alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%