2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized phase II study evaluating weekly oral vinorelbine versus weekly paclitaxel in estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative patients with advanced breast cancer (NorBreast-231 trial)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Aapro et al in the NorBreast-231 trial, which investigated the survival with chemotherapy (taxol or vinorelbine oral) in this context, found a DFS similar in both arms of only 6.4 months [22]. The results with second line endocrine therapy are also disappointing, with an approximate DFS of 7 months with fulvestrant [23,24], and with the combination of fulvestrant with targeted therapy with a significant DFS around 11-16 months [25,26]. Recently, the pearl study demonstrated similar results in DFS (9-11 months) among the combination with endocrine therapy and palbociclib and treatment with chemotherapy with capecitabine in second-line treatment [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In contrast, Aapro et al in the NorBreast-231 trial, which investigated the survival with chemotherapy (taxol or vinorelbine oral) in this context, found a DFS similar in both arms of only 6.4 months [22]. The results with second line endocrine therapy are also disappointing, with an approximate DFS of 7 months with fulvestrant [23,24], and with the combination of fulvestrant with targeted therapy with a significant DFS around 11-16 months [25,26]. Recently, the pearl study demonstrated similar results in DFS (9-11 months) among the combination with endocrine therapy and palbociclib and treatment with chemotherapy with capecitabine in second-line treatment [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Yuan et al 2019 investigates a head-to-head comparison of two key comparators—ERI and VIN. The inclusion of a connection to VIN monotherapy in the analysis would expand the existing base-case network by opening additional indirect comparisons to other eligible comparators including: docetaxel [ 30 ], GEM + docetaxel [ 31 ], CAP + docetaxel [ 32 ], paclitaxel [ 33 ], and nab-paclitaxel [ 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Наиболее частыми токсическими осложнениями химиотерапии 3-4 степени при использовании винорелбина были нейтропения (52%), утомляемость (11%) и рвота (5%), при использовании паклитаксела -нейтропения (17%), одышка (6%), артериальная гипертензия (6%) и периферическая сенсорная невропатия (5%). Проявлений кардиотоксичности на фоне применения винкаалкалоидов отмечено не было [39].…”
Section: алкалоиды барвинка розового (винкаалкалоиды)unclassified