2022
DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000005682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Ruxolitinib for COVID-19–Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome*

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in COVID-19–associated acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring mechanical ventilation. DESIGN: Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Ruxolitinib in Participants With COVID-19–Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Who Require Mechanical Ventilation (RUXCOVID-DEVENT; NCT04377620). SETTING: Hospitals and community-ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, there are 22 clinical studies listed on ClinicalTrials.gov , only six studies have been completed, and an equal number of trials have been terminated or withdrawn ( Table 2 ). Notably, sponsors terminated an interventional phase III clinical trial (RUXCOVID-DEVENT), observing no significant difference in the 28-day mortality rate in ruxolitinib group and placebo group in the ruxolitinib group and placebo group COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome patients on mechanical ventilation ( Rein et al, 2022 ). Similarly, in another international, randomized, phase 3 trial (RUXCOVID; NCT04362137) of ruxolitinib vs. placebo, associated with the standard of care in hospitalized COVID-19 patients but not on mechanical ventilation or in ICU, ruxolitinib 5 mg BID did not meet its primary endpoint and demonstrated no benefit in the overall studied population ( Han et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Jakinibs and Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there are 22 clinical studies listed on ClinicalTrials.gov , only six studies have been completed, and an equal number of trials have been terminated or withdrawn ( Table 2 ). Notably, sponsors terminated an interventional phase III clinical trial (RUXCOVID-DEVENT), observing no significant difference in the 28-day mortality rate in ruxolitinib group and placebo group in the ruxolitinib group and placebo group COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome patients on mechanical ventilation ( Rein et al, 2022 ). Similarly, in another international, randomized, phase 3 trial (RUXCOVID; NCT04362137) of ruxolitinib vs. placebo, associated with the standard of care in hospitalized COVID-19 patients but not on mechanical ventilation or in ICU, ruxolitinib 5 mg BID did not meet its primary endpoint and demonstrated no benefit in the overall studied population ( Han et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Jakinibs and Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of the current study, we can therefore consider methotrexate a reasonable option [ 45 ]. Ruxolitinib, the third most-screened medicine, is known for inhibiting JAK1 and JAK2 and thereby inhibiting tumor invasion and tumorigenesis in human GBM, and it was also employed during COVID-19 for combined antiviral and anti-inflammatory therapy [ 46 , 47 ]. As a result, these medications already demonstrated their efficacy during the pandemic in patients who were already suffering from various ailments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this setting, dexamethasone has demonstrated an impact on overall mortality in a randomized phase III clinical trial and has been adopted as standard of care (9). On the other hand, tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor antagonist, reached more conflicting results and is commonly administered to patients that do not respond to initial therapies (10,25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RUXCOVID-DEVENT trial compared the activity of two doses of ruxolitinib (5 mg or 15mg twice a day) versus placebo in more than 200 cases hospitalized with severe acute respiratory syndrome due coronavirus 2 ( 26 ). However, no significant difference in mortality was observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%