2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Phase 2 Study of Osimertinib Plus Bevacizumab Versus Osimertinib for Untreated Patients With Nonsquamous NSCLC Harboring EGFR Mutations: WJOG9717L Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, patients with symptomatic brain metastasis or LM were excluded from these clinical studies. As such, the therapeutic benefits of osimertinib plus bevacizumab for LM merit further investigation ( 18 , 19 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, patients with symptomatic brain metastasis or LM were excluded from these clinical studies. As such, the therapeutic benefits of osimertinib plus bevacizumab for LM merit further investigation ( 18 , 19 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, patients with symptomatic brain metastasis or LM were excluded from these clinical studies. As such, the therapeutic benefits of osimertinib plus bevacizumab for LM merit further investigation (18,19). Preclinical studies have confirmed that almonertinib has a higher intracranial concentration and good BBB penetration.…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…WJOG9717L which combined osimertinib with bevacizumab reported no PFS benefit compared to osimertinib alone. 99 FLAURA2 has safely opened up its investigation by demonstrating a manageable safety and tolerability in patients treated with osimertinib in combination with pemetrexed and platinum doublet chemotherapy. 100 We have previously experienced in NEJ009 trial that gefitinib in combination with chemotherapy could prolong PFS compared to gefitinib alone, 101 while the OS benefit was not apparent.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 Two randomized phase 2 trials, WJOG8715L and BOOSTER, both revealed that there was no PFS benefit of bevacizumab plus osimertinib over osimertinib in secondline EGFR T790M mutation population. 14,15 In this issue of the Journal of Thoracic Oncology, Kenmotsu et al 16 present the first randomized study comparing bevacizumab plus osimertinib with osimertinib in the first-line setting-WJOG9717L. The primary end point, PFS, was 22.1 months in bevacizumab plus osimertinib versus 20.2 months in osimertinib arm, and there was no statistically significant difference (HR ¼ 0.862, p ¼ 0.213).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%