1978
DOI: 10.1177/0193841x7800200411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Field Experiments for Program Planning, Development, and Evaluation

Abstract: This bibliography lists references to over 300 field experiments undertaken in schools, hospitals, prisons, and other social settings, mainly in the U.S. The list is divided into 10 major categories corresponding to the type of program under examination. They include: criminal and civil justice programs, mental health, training and education, mass media, information collection, utilization, commerce and industry, welfare, health, and family planning. The main purpose of the bibliography is to provide eviden… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RCTs are typically considered the best method for eliminating threats to internal validity in evaluating social policies and programs (Berk et al 1985;Boruch et al 1978;Campbell 1969;Campbell and Stanley 1963;Dennis and Boruch 1989). RCTs provide a strong counterfactual description of what would have happened to the treatment group if they had not been exposed to the treatment (Rubin 1974;Holland 1986).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RCTs are typically considered the best method for eliminating threats to internal validity in evaluating social policies and programs (Berk et al 1985;Boruch et al 1978;Campbell 1969;Campbell and Stanley 1963;Dennis and Boruch 1989). RCTs provide a strong counterfactual description of what would have happened to the treatment group if they had not been exposed to the treatment (Rubin 1974;Holland 1986).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem with these types of studies is that although measured differences can be statistically controlled, the many unmeasured variables related to the outcome variable (e.g., susceptibility to change) cannot be controlled. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are typically thought of as the best method for eliminating threats to internal validity in evaluating social policies and programs (Berk et al 1985;Boruch, et al 1978;Campbell 1969;Campbell and Stanley 1963;Dennis and Boruch 1989;Riecken, et al 1974). RCTs provide the best counterfactual describing what would have happened to the treatment group if it had not been exposed to the treatment (Rubin 1974;Holland 1986).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forsetlund, Chalmers, and Bjorndal (2007) used bibliographic methods to try and track down the earliest publications reporting experimental studies of social interventions. Petrosino (2003) listed numerous examples of RCTs in the field of childhood intervention in the human services, and Boruch (1974) and Boruch, McSweeney, and Soderstrom (1978) tabulated the use of RCTs in social evaluation studies. The present bibliography is offered as a further contribution along these lines in the hope that it will be of service to future scholars in the field of research on social work practice and to provide inspiration to social workers contemplating undertaking an experimental investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%