2018
DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000003437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Feasibility Trial of a Low Tidal Volume-Airway Pressure Release Ventilation Protocol Compared With Traditional Airway Pressure Release Ventilation and Volume Control Ventilation Protocols

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(87 reference statements)
1
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5b). In addition, there was no evidence that the Vt of 12 ml/kg caused VILI since there were no significant differences in PaO 2 /FiO 2 (P/F) ratio, sedation, vasoactive medications, pneumothorax, or outcome between groups [95]. Lastly, the T Low was not set to a strict E FP × 75% = E FT .…”
Section: Analysis Of Recent Rcts Using the Aprv Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…5b). In addition, there was no evidence that the Vt of 12 ml/kg caused VILI since there were no significant differences in PaO 2 /FiO 2 (P/F) ratio, sedation, vasoactive medications, pneumothorax, or outcome between groups [95]. Lastly, the T Low was not set to a strict E FP × 75% = E FT .…”
Section: Analysis Of Recent Rcts Using the Aprv Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, one of the critical protective mechanisms of the TCAV method, the ability to fully open the lung, was not incorporated into the APRV setting in either the Hirshberg or Ganesan study. The conclusion from these clinical studies should not be that "APRV is not lung protective" but rather that the Zhou (Zhou et al, 2017) and TCAV methods (Andrews et al, 2013) are superior to the Ganesan (Lalgudi Ganesan et al, 2018) and Hirshberg (Hirshberg et al, 2018) methods for lung protection. Two recent statistical reviews and meta-analyses of RCTs have shown the APRV mode is associated with a mortality benefit, improved oxygenation, and a greater number of ventilator-free days when compared with conventional ventilation strategies, FIGURE 13 | Chest X-rays (CXRs) and blood gases in a patient with respiratory failure on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).…”
Section: The Tcav Methods To Open and Stabilize The Acutely Injured Lungmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We postulate that this is also the reason for the failed RCTs using an RM and titrated PEEP (Brower et al, 2004;Meade et al, 2008;Mercat et al, 2008;Cavalcanti et al, 2017). Hirshberg et al (2018) conducted an RCT in adults, and similarly to the Ganesan study, targeted a Vt at ∼6 mL/kg. The study was stopped early, in part because the Vt often exceeded 12 mL/kg, even though there were no significant differences between groups in pneumothorax, sedation, vasoactive medications, P/F ratio, or outcome (Hirshberg et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Tcav Methods To Open and Stabilize The Acutely Injured Lungmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One randomised controlled trial [99] sought to impose LVT (6-7 cc•kg −1 ) to patients on APRV (APRV-LVT) and found that there was a higher mortality as compared with standard LVT ventilation Another three-armed study [100] aimed at comparing LVT with APRV-LVT and TCAV revealed no significant difference between the three groups in terms of oxygenation or mortality, with the main flaw of the study being that it was limited by power. In addition, the authors reported concerns regarding measured release volumes of >8 cc•kg −1 in the APRV and APRV-LVT groups, but made no mention of the driving pressure or compliance [100]. In an open, compliant lung, this VT is probably affiliated with a low driving pressure and will be distributed across a set of open homogenous alveoli reflecting small alveolar VT [22].…”
Section: Aprv Critiquementioning
confidence: 99%