2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.accreview.2003.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent in saphenous vein grafts: the randomized evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene COVERed stent in saphenous vein grafts (RECOVERS) trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
62
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the 6-month non Q-wave myocardial infarction rate was higher in the stent-graft group (12.8% versus 4.1%, p =0.013), the cumulative major adverse cardiac event rate was not different (23.1% versus 15.9%, p=0.153). This study also failed to demonstrate a beneficial effect of the JOSTENT stent-graft for saphenous vein graft treatment (Stankovic et al, 2003).…”
Section: Covered Stents For the Treatment Of Saphenous Vein Graftsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the 6-month non Q-wave myocardial infarction rate was higher in the stent-graft group (12.8% versus 4.1%, p =0.013), the cumulative major adverse cardiac event rate was not different (23.1% versus 15.9%, p=0.153). This study also failed to demonstrate a beneficial effect of the JOSTENT stent-graft for saphenous vein graft treatment (Stankovic et al, 2003).…”
Section: Covered Stents For the Treatment Of Saphenous Vein Graftsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…However, even with the use of stents treatment of saphenous vein graft lesions is associated with a high incidence of acute complications, principally distal embolisation and periprocedural myocardial infarction, because of the more friable atherosclerotic or thrombotic components of the saphenous vein graft lesions (Stankovic et al, 2003). Besides, the results of bare metal stents in saphenous vein grafts are less favourable than those in native vessels, with restenosis rates exceeding 30% (Savage et al, 1997;Silber et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Entretanto, versões prévias estiveram relacionadas a maiores taxas de trombose e outras complicações. Stankovic et al 9 , ao testarem o stent Jomed ® , coberto por membrana de politetrafluoroetileno (PTFE), em PS, observaram maior incidência de IAM aos trinta dias e seis meses quando comparado ao stent não-farmacológico de aço inoxidável. Efeito de borda (reestenose) pelas altas pressões de liberação exigidas para boa expansão do material do stent e até lesões da membrana de PTFE no momento do implante podem explicar tais resultados.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Further evaluation is needed in this regard. 4 Presently he is on regular follow-up and symptom free at 12-month follow-up. In our case, repeat angiogram at 1-month follow-up showed no evidence of restenosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%