2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2207.04291
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Douglas-Rachford method for linear systems: Improved accuracy and efficiency

Abstract: The Douglas-Rachford (DR) method is a widely used method for finding a point in the intersection of two closed convex sets (feasibility problem). However, the method converges weakly and the associated rate of convergence is hard to analyze in general. In addition, the direct extension of the DR method for solving more-than-two-sets feasibility problems, called the r-sets-DR method, is not necessarily convergent. Recently, the introduction of randomization and momentum techniques in optimization algorithms has… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Polyak's momentum has been extended to solve the constrained and distributed optimization problems, confirming its performance advantages over standard gradient-based methods; see, e.g., [11,35]. In the context of solving liner system, Polyak's momentum technique has been spurred many related works by incorporating into various randomized iterative methods, e.g., randomized coordinate descent and Kaczmarz [22], sketch and project [22], sampling Kaczmarz Motzkin [23], randomized Douglas-Rachford [13], doubly stochastic iterative framework [14], and so on.…”
Section: The Pmrgrk Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polyak's momentum has been extended to solve the constrained and distributed optimization problems, confirming its performance advantages over standard gradient-based methods; see, e.g., [11,35]. In the context of solving liner system, Polyak's momentum technique has been spurred many related works by incorporating into various randomized iterative methods, e.g., randomized coordinate descent and Kaczmarz [22], sketch and project [22], sampling Kaczmarz Motzkin [23], randomized Douglas-Rachford [13], doubly stochastic iterative framework [14], and so on.…”
Section: The Pmrgrk Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameterization techniques to make DR algorithms more flexible in practice. Moreover, in the numerical experimental part of PDR, we observe that it saves a significant amount of running time compared to DR. Not only the PDR splitting method but much work (see [17][18][19]) on DR splitting methods has been done by adding parameters to its formulations, and it illustrates the superiority of parameterization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the inexact proximal point algorithm, Alves et al [22] combined inertial step and overrelaxation to propose a partially inexact inertial-relaxed Douglas-Rachford algorithm. Meanwhile, Han et al [19] study the randomized r-sets-Douglas-Rachford (RrDR) method with the inertial scheme and show that it converges at an accelerated linear rate. Additionally, Feng et al [23] developed an inertial Douglas-Rachford splitting (IDRS) method and demonstrated its validity in terms of signal recovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When 𝛽 = 0, this method resolves into the so-called gradient descent method. In the context of projection-based iterative methods, the Polyak momentum technique has been incorporated into various methods, for example, randomized coordinate descent and Kaczmarz (mRK), 25 randomized block Kaczmarz (mRBK) using the framework of sketch and project, 26 sampling Kaczmarz Motzkin, 27 randomized r-sets-Douglas-Rachford (mRrDR), 28 and doubly stochastic iterative framework. 26 For other related works, we refer to References 29 and 30 and the references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IT (a) and CPU (b) versus m for mRK,25 mRrRD,28 mMWRK, and mFDBK when n = 150 in Example 1 with r = n∕10 and 𝜅 = n∕10.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%