Randomized, double‐blind, sham‐controlled evaluation of the effect of functional continuous magnetic stimulation in patients with urgency incontinence

Suzuki, Teruyuki; Yasuda, Kosaku; Yamanishi, Tomonori; Kitahara, Satoshi; Nakai, Hideo; Suda, Shin; Ohkawa, Hiromi

doi:10.1002/nau.20423

Cited by 37 publications

(85 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[120][121][122] Other studies have shown equivalent efficacy to oxybutynin. 123,124 The efficacy of interferential low-frequency therapy has also been demonstrated in an RCT.…”

Section: Grade Of Recommendation: C1 (Electrical Stimulation) Not Apmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical guideline for male lower urinary tract symptoms

et al. 2009

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article is a shortened version of the clinical guideline for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), which has been developed in Japan for symptomatic men aged 50 years and over irrespective of presumed diagnoses. The guideline was formed on the PubMed database between 1995 and 2007 and other relevant sources. The causes of male LUTS are diverse and attributable to diseases/dysfunctions of the lower urinary tract, prostate, nervous system, and other organ systems, with benign prostatic hyperplasia, bladder dysfunction, polyuria, and their combination being most common. The mandatory assessment should comprise medical history, physical examination, urinalysis, and measurement of serum prostate-specific antigen. Symptom and quality of life questionnaires, bladder diary, residual urine measurement, urine cytology, urine culture, measurement of serum creatinine, and urinary tract ultrasonography would be optional tests. The Core Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Score Questionnaire may be useful in quickly capturing important symptoms. Severe symptoms, pain symptoms, and other clinical problems would indicate urological referral. One should be careful not to overlook underlying diseases such as infection or malignancy. The treatment should be initiated with conservative therapy and/or medicine such as a1-blockers. Treatment with anticholinergic agents should be reserved only for urologists, considering the risk of urinary retention. The present guideline should help urologists and especially non-urologists treat men with LUTS.

show abstract

“…[120][121][122] Other studies have shown equivalent efficacy to oxybutynin. 123,124 The efficacy of interferential low-frequency therapy has also been demonstrated in an RCT.…”

Section: Grade Of Recommendation: C1 (Electrical Stimulation) Not Apmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical guideline for male lower urinary tract symptoms

et al. 2009

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…12 There have been few randomized controlled studies with a small number of patients to verify the efficacy of magnetic stimulation for the treatment of OAB. 9,13 In our previous preliminary study, the effectiveness of magnetic stimulation therapy was evaluated in a randomized, crossover trial comparing the active stimulation and the sham stimulation in a small group of patients (16 males and 23 females). 13 The number of leaks/week in the bladder diary, the total score of International Consultation on Incontinence-Questionnaire: Short Form and maximum cystometric capacity by urodynamic study were significantly improved as compared with the initial levels in the active stimulation group, but not in the sham stimulation group.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multicenter, randomized, sham‐controlled study on the efficacy of magnetic stimulation for women with urgency urinary incontinence

et al. 2013

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of magnetic stimulation for the treatment of urinary incontinence in women with overactive bladder. Methods: A total of 151 women with urgency incontinence were randomized to the active stimulation group or the sham stimulation group in a 2:1 order. An armchair type magnetic stimulator was used for 25-min magnetic stimulation twice a week, with the maximum magnetic flux density of 560 mT peak at 10 Hz. The sham device was set to deliver in a 5-s "on"-5-s "off" pulsing manner with the maximum intensity of 20.4% of active stimulation at 1 Hz. The study consisted of a baseline period for 1 week, and a treatment period for 6 weeks. The primary end-point was the number of leaks/week from the bladder diary. The secondary end-points were the number of voids and urgency/24 h, mean and maximum voided volume, and the quality of life assessment. Results: Changes from baseline in the active and sham group, respectively, were −13.08 ± 11.00 and −8.68 ± 13.49 in leaks/week (P = 0.038), −2.65 ± 2.52 and −1.53 ± 2.39 in number of urgency/24 h (P = 0.011), and 14.03 ± 34.53 mL and −4.15 ± 40.60 mL in mean voided volume (P = 0.0056). As for safety, except for diarrhea and constipation, no patients experienced any device-related adverse event. Conclusions: Magnetic stimulation is effective for the treatment of urgency incontinence in female patients with overactive bladder.

show abstract

“…По результатам работы было зафикси-ровано улучшение всех параметров через 10 нед после начала и в конце исследования в группе активного лечения [30]. В 2014 г. группа ученых во главе с T. Yamanishi опубликовали данные мультицентрового рандомизированного слепого плацебоконтроли-руемого исследования, включившего 151 женщину с ИНМ.…”

Section: том 7 Volunclassified

“…отмечали сохранение терапевтического эф-фекта через 24 нед после окончания курса процедур у 9 из 17 пациентов, T. Suzuki и соавт. получили анало-гичные результаты у 6 из 16 больных через год после лечения, при этом не была использована какая-либо дополнительная терапия [30,32]. Однако F. G. Almeida и соавт., наблюдая немедленное клиническое улучше-ние у 34 пациентов из 91, констатировали рецидив симптоматики в 94 % случаев через год после прекра-щения лечения [33].…”

Section: том 7 Volunclassified

Peripheral repetitive magnetic stimulation for the treatment of neurogenic urinary disorders: literature review and investigational study

Borodulina¹,

Rachin²,

Бадалов³

et al. 2017

Neuromuscular Diseases

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ТОМ 7 VOL. 7Нервно-мышечные Б О Л Е З Н И Neuromuscular DISEASES 54 Оригинальные исследованияВведение Возможности терапевтического применения энер-гии магнитного поля -предмет практического инте-реса на протяжении нескольких столетий. Начало этому пути положили эксперименты Л. Гальвани, ко-торый в XVIII веке сформулировал теорию животного электричества и создал базу для развития электрофи-зиологии. С этого времени началось более глубокое изучение электромагнитного взаимодействия. Откры-тие явления электромагнитной индукции М. Фараде-ем в середине XIX века позволило установить, что в от-вет на переменное магнитное поле (ПМП) в проводящей среде возникает электрический ток. На этом постулате физики в последующем базировал-ся механизм воздействия магнитного импульса на жи-вую ткань. В противоположность электрической сти-муляции

show abstract

Randomized, double‐blind, sham‐controlled evaluation of the effect of functional continuous magnetic stimulation in patients with urgency incontinence

Abstract: Magnetic stimulation was effective on urgency incontinence in comparison to sham stimulation in this small patient group.

Cited by 37 publications

References 27 publications

Clinical guideline for male lower urinary tract symptoms

Clinical guideline for male lower urinary tract symptoms

Multicenter, randomized, sham‐controlled study on the efficacy of magnetic stimulation for women with urgency urinary incontinence

Peripheral repetitive magnetic stimulation for the treatment of neurogenic urinary disorders: literature review and investigational study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About