2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01215.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Crossover Study of Short-Term Effect of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Neuropathic Pain

Abstract: PENS therapy appears to be effective in providing short-term pain relief in chronic pain conditions. Studies, involving larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are recommended.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The previous three controlled trials concerning PNS used comparable pulse width settings (16)(17)(18). Two of these studies used lowfrequency stimulation (15,16), while the third used alternating lowand high-frequency stimulation (17). For this audit, low-frequency stimulation was selected, as this frequency has been suggested to be associated with long-term depression of synaptic efficacy, cardiac pacemaker or spinal cord stimulator *Scale 0-10; 0, "no pain"; 10, "pain as bad as you can imagine. "…”
Section: En-pns Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous three controlled trials concerning PNS used comparable pulse width settings (16)(17)(18). Two of these studies used lowfrequency stimulation (15,16), while the third used alternating lowand high-frequency stimulation (17). For this audit, low-frequency stimulation was selected, as this frequency has been suggested to be associated with long-term depression of synaptic efficacy, cardiac pacemaker or spinal cord stimulator *Scale 0-10; 0, "no pain"; 10, "pain as bad as you can imagine. "…”
Section: En-pns Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is in keeping with both the technique used in the previous study [19] and literature regarding implantable PNS [9, 29]. The independent physiotherapist will have no further direct patient contact during the trial.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As used by Raphael et al . , a double‐blinded sham‐controlled crossover study of the efficacy of PENS neurostimulation would have much improved the merit of this study but was not practical at this early stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatments were repeated when pain returned, with the procedure being well tolerated. In another randomised, double‐blind, sham‐controlled crossover study of 31 patients with surface hyperalgesia, median numerical rating scale for neuropathic pain changed from 7.5/10 before treatment to 0.5/10 with a follow‐up time of one week .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%