2014
DOI: 10.1086/676425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Crossover Study Evaluating the Effect of a Hand Sanitizer Dispenser on the Frequency of Hand Hygiene among Anesthesiology Staff in the Operating Room

Abstract: Forty anesthesia providers were evaluated with and without hand sanitizer dispensers present on the anesthesia machine. Having a dispenser increased the frequency of hand hygiene only from 0.5 to 0.8 events per hour (P = .01). Other concomitant interventions are needed to further increase hand hygiene frequency among anesthesia providers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have shown that hand hygiene availability close to the point of use can improve health care worker adherence. 20 However, as demonstrated in a study by Hass and Larson, 21 providing personal hand rub dispensers alone may not lead to sustained improvements in hand hygiene. The use of a contest (awarding a trophy and US$5,000 to the hospital with the best hand hygiene adherence) may have contributed to the improvements seen after the initial intervention implementation; however, it is unlikely that the contest was still affecting hand hygiene adherence 5 years after the initial intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Previous studies have shown that hand hygiene availability close to the point of use can improve health care worker adherence. 20 However, as demonstrated in a study by Hass and Larson, 21 providing personal hand rub dispensers alone may not lead to sustained improvements in hand hygiene. The use of a contest (awarding a trophy and US$5,000 to the hospital with the best hand hygiene adherence) may have contributed to the improvements seen after the initial intervention implementation; however, it is unlikely that the contest was still affecting hand hygiene adherence 5 years after the initial intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The rapid development of AMR poses a global threat to human health as antimicrobials for treating HAI have become an endangered resource [ 8 ]. Hand hygiene (HH) has been recognized as one of the most important and cost-effective measures to prevent HAI, and the introduction of the alcohol-based hand rub has facilitated the adoption of HH practice at the point of care [ 9 - 11 ]. A systematic review of HH in intensive care units (ICU) and general wards showed a mean compliance rate of 40%, and the lowest compliance rates were found in ICUs and among physicians [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Muñoz-Price et al 4 showed that increasing access to ABHR led to an increase in the number of times HH was performed by anesthesiology staff during a surgical procedure. 4 Another study suggests that wearable ABHR dispensers improve HH adherence among anesthesia providers. 5 Koff et al 6 showed that the use of a wearable ABHR dispenser capable of recording HH events decreased the contamination rate of intravenous tubing in the operating room (OR).…”
Section: Hand Hygienementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subsequent study by Muñoz-Price et al reported that placing an ABHR dispenser on the anesthesia machine, in addition to standard wall-mounted dispensers, increased the rate of HH events from 0.5 to 0.8 events per hour (p = 01.01). 4 ABHRs are able to achieve a~4-log (99.99%) reduction in microorganisms on providers' hands after a single application. 115 Petty 5 suggests routine use of wearable ABHR dispenser to improve HH compliance among anesthesia staff.…”
Section: Hand Hygienementioning
confidence: 99%