Randomized controlled trials of mental health nurse‐delivered interventions: A systematic review

Dickens, Geoffrey L.; Maqbali, Mohammed Al; Blay, Nicole; Hallett, Nutmeg; Ion, Robin; Lingwood, Louise; Schoultz, Mariyana; Tabvuma, Tracy

doi:10.1111/jpm.12881

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 90 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1–6 However, there is a consensus in the nursing literature that psychiatric and/or mental health nursing falls short in describing the benefits of their work through outcome measures despite the vast amount of their outcomes in qualitative research. 7–9 Developing valid and reliable scales to measure outcomes of nurse-sensitive care, particularly in the interprofessional context of mental healthcare in hospitals, is a complex challenge. 10–13 Having valid and reliable scales to measure outcomes of psychiatric and/or mental health nursing is important for various reasons.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It guides clinical practice and nursing education, facilitates the assessment of nursing quality through monitoring and benchmarking, enables the development of research-based nurse-delivered care and interventions and enhances public accountability of the nursing profession. 7 9 14 15 The lack of plausible outcome measures for nurse-delivered care and interventions has a negative impact on demonstrating the quality of current and future nursing practice, as well as on the skills and role development of psychiatric and/or mental health nurses within the workforce. 16–20 Moreover, the absence of distinct measured outcomes poses a risk to the erosion of the specialisation of psychiatric and/or mental health nursing and hampers their involvement in reforming guidelines and policies for improving outcome-based mental healthcare services.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Patient-reported outcomes of psychiatric and/or mental health nursing in hospitals: a systematic review protocol

Desmet,

Vrancken,

Bergs

et al. 2024

BMJ Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionThere is a lack of distinct and measurable outcomes in psychiatric and/or mental health nursing which negatively impacts guiding clinical practice, assessing evidence-based nursing interventions, ensuring future-proof nursing education and establishing visibility as a profession and discipline. Psychiatric and/or mental health nursing struggle to demonstrate patient-reported outcomes to assess the effectiveness of their practice. A systematic review that summarising patient-reported outcomes, associated factors, measured nursing care/interventions and used measurement scales of psychiatric and/or mental health nursing in the adult population in acute, intensive and forensic psychiatric wards in hospitals will capture important information on how care can be improved by better understanding what matters and what is important to patients themselves. This review can contribute to the design, planning, delivery and assessment of the quality of current and future nursing careMethods and analysisThis protocol follows the Cochrane methodological guidance on systematic reviews of interventions and The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol. The search strategy will be identified by consultations with clinical and methodological experts and by exploring the literature. The databases Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, APA PsychARTICLES, Web of Science and Scopus will be searched for all published studies. Studies will be screened and selected with criteria described in the population, intervention, control and outcomes format after a pilot test by two researchers. Studies will be screened in two stages: (1) title and abstract screening and (2) full-text screening. Data extraction and the quality assessment based on the Johanna Briggs Institute guidelines will be conducted by two researchers. Data will be presented in a narrative synthesis.Ethics and disseminationNo ethical approval is needed since all data are already publicly accessible. The results of this work will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42023363806.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%