2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1386-6346(00)00080-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized controlled trial of twice-a-day administration of natural interferon β for chronic hepatitis C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Japan, the use of IFN-β aiming to enhance viral clearance in the early phase of treatment when administering induction therapy has been reported [20][21][22][23] . A characteristic of IFN-β is that the administration in equally divided doses in the morning and evening increases the HCV-RNA reduction rate [11][12][13][14][15] , as we first reported (in Japanese) in 1995 [24] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Japan, the use of IFN-β aiming to enhance viral clearance in the early phase of treatment when administering induction therapy has been reported [20][21][22][23] . A characteristic of IFN-β is that the administration in equally divided doses in the morning and evening increases the HCV-RNA reduction rate [11][12][13][14][15] , as we first reported (in Japanese) in 1995 [24] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many reports to date on IFN‐β induction therapy in clinical practice, HCV RNA negativization or a steep slope of viral decline was described in the initial stage of treatment, but a pronounced increase in the SVR rate was not obtained 20,21 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many reports to date on IFN-b induction therapy in clinical practice, HCV RNA negativization or a steep slope of viral decline was described in the initial stage of treatment, but a pronounced increase in the SVR rate was not obtained. 20,21 When the viral negativization was accelerated by the IFN-b induction, LVR patients, for whom PEG IFN-a-2b/RBV combination therapy for 72 weeks is usually required, would be regarded as having EVR and undergo 48-week PEG IFN-a-2b/RBV combination therapy. A long-standing clinical concern was that the use of IFN-b in promoting rapid viral clearance might result in an increase in the proportion of relapses because LVR patients requiring 72-week PEG IFN-a-2b plus RBV combination therapy would be judged as EVR patients and treated for only 48 weeks.…”
Section: N Japan Most Patients With Chc Have Genotype 1bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, twice‐daily treatment induced more adverse reactions, including thrombocytopenia and renal toxicity. Therefore, it is difficult to continue twice‐daily administration for a long period of time, and no significant increase in SVR has been achieved with twice‐daily treatment compared to once‐daily treatment 21–23 . Given that ribavirin combination therapy with more potent induction therapy could achieve earlier viral clearance and could improve the SVR, we decided to give IFN‐β twice daily for 2 weeks, while taking safety into account.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is difficult to continue twice-daily administration for a long period of time, and no significant increase in SVR has been achieved with twice-daily treatment compared to once-daily treatment. [21][22][23] Given that ribavirin combination therapy with more potent induction therapy could achieve earlier viral clearance and could improve the SVR, we decided to give IFN-b twice daily for 2 weeks, while taking safety into account. As expected, the HCV-RNA-negative rate with twice-daily treatment (40%) was higher than that for once-daily treatment (23%); while the negative rate for twice-daily treatment was higher, there was no marked difference in the cumulative HCV-RNA-negative rate or the SVR compared to once-daily treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%