2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00743.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized controlled trial of prophylactic repair of hemodialysis arteriovenous graft stenosis

Abstract: Compared with a strategy of observation and repair of accesses only in the event of thrombosis, prospective static venous pressure monitoring with prophylactic stenosis repair did not prolong graft survival.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
94
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
94
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several randomized studies on the other hand have suggested that preemptive angioplasty fails to prevent access thrombosis. A prospective randomized trial [10] of 64 patients monitored with monthly static venousto-systolic blood pressure ratios compared prophylactic angioplasty with the strategy of delayed invasive management at the time of thrombosis and observed similar rates of thrombosis rates and access loss [10]. Another randomized trial [11] of 112 patients compared monthly access blood-flow measurements with standard surveillance and reported that the greater number of interventions were performed in the surveillance group than in the control group did not reduced the rate of access thrombosis (41% vs. 51% per 100 patient-yrs, P ¼ NS).…”
Section: Preemptive Angioplastymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several randomized studies on the other hand have suggested that preemptive angioplasty fails to prevent access thrombosis. A prospective randomized trial [10] of 64 patients monitored with monthly static venousto-systolic blood pressure ratios compared prophylactic angioplasty with the strategy of delayed invasive management at the time of thrombosis and observed similar rates of thrombosis rates and access loss [10]. Another randomized trial [11] of 112 patients compared monthly access blood-flow measurements with standard surveillance and reported that the greater number of interventions were performed in the surveillance group than in the control group did not reduced the rate of access thrombosis (41% vs. 51% per 100 patient-yrs, P ¼ NS).…”
Section: Preemptive Angioplastymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, we focused on the economic impact of an aggressive angiography program to prevent access thrombosis, a measurable and desirable outcome evaluated in multiple reports [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]24]. We also determined whether thrombosis rates would translate into some measurable difference in access site attrition and observed similar rates of access loss requiring the use of tunneled catheters or surgical revision between the baseline and screening periods (5.7% vs. 5.7% per 100 patient-yrs).…”
Section: Other Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The recommended approach to treating stenosis in either AVGs or AVFs is percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) (30). Although PTA can restore patency and function of accesses with thrombosis, the benefits are less clear for accesses that are stenosed but still patent (31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36). Balloon-induced injury may stimulate more aggressive neointimal hyperplasia by damaging endothelial cells and stimulating smooth muscle cell proliferation.…”
Section: Endovascular Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the role of AVF surveillance is still widely debated. In particular, the literature does not clarified whether surveillance associated with preemptive surgery can prolong AVF survival (1). However, the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) clinical practice guidelines suggest a careful instrumental monitoring to prevent thrombosis (2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%