2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Controlled Trial of Oxygen Saturation Targets in Very Preterm Infants: Two Year Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BOOST II trial was halted because an interim analysis showed that survival at 36 wk PMA was higher with the higher oxygen saturation target (14). However, 2-y outcomes did not show a significant effect on the rate of death or disability (New Zealand Collaborative Group) (25). On the other hand, the Canadian Oxygen Trial did not show an increase in mortality or disability at 18 mo with the lower SpO 2 target of 85-89% compared with 91-95% (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The BOOST II trial was halted because an interim analysis showed that survival at 36 wk PMA was higher with the higher oxygen saturation target (14). However, 2-y outcomes did not show a significant effect on the rate of death or disability (New Zealand Collaborative Group) (25). On the other hand, the Canadian Oxygen Trial did not show an increase in mortality or disability at 18 mo with the lower SpO 2 target of 85-89% compared with 91-95% (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Therefore, to minimize the risk of bias from postrandomization exclusions, alternative measures of cognition and language were prespecified in revised statistical analysis plans before the data were analyzed (Tables S1 through S3 in the Supplementary Appendix, available at NEJM.org). 7,14 If these outcomes remained unknown and the child was not blind or deaf and did not have cerebral palsy, data on the primary outcome were judged as missing.…”
Section: Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8] These trials, known collectively as the Neonatal Oxygen Prospective Meta-analysis (NeOProM) Collaboration, were designed to compare the effects of a lower oxygen-saturation target range (85 to 89%) versus a higher target range (91 to 95%) on a primary outcome of death or major disability at 18 to 24 months, with age corrected for prematurity. 3 Observational data had suggested that targeting an oxygen saturation below 90% was associated with a lower risk of severe retinopathy, with no difference in the rate of cerebral palsy or survival, 9 and that the long-accepted "physiologic" targets of oxygen saturation may be too high.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No signifi cant differences in a pooled analysis of all 3 trials 47 • Change in oximeter algorithm during the study No signifi cant difference in individual trial analyses 46,48 • Study stopped before complete enrollment N = 2448…”
Section: Randomized Clinical Trials Of Oxygen Targetingmentioning
confidence: 99%