2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized comparison of anterolateral versus anteroposterior electrode position for biphasic external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Twenty‐five studies were selected as potentially relevant and accessed for full‐text review, and the remaining 763 studies were excluded for various reasons. Twelve studies were excluded after full‐text review, while the remaining 13 studies were included in the review involving 836 patients receiving A‐P and 856 patients receiving A‐L pad placement . One of the included studies was only found in the bibliography of several included studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Twenty‐five studies were selected as potentially relevant and accessed for full‐text review, and the remaining 763 studies were excluded for various reasons. Twelve studies were excluded after full‐text review, while the remaining 13 studies were included in the review involving 836 patients receiving A‐P and 856 patients receiving A‐L pad placement . One of the included studies was only found in the bibliography of several included studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study administered shocks based on the patients' weights, while the remaining studies administered shocks at predetermined energy levels. Overall, monophasic waveforms were used in seven studies, five studies involved biphasic, and one study analyzed both waveform devices . In six studies, if normal sinus rhythm was not restored by the end of the shock protocol, patients received an additional crossover shock in the alternate pad position .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the mice were treated for 35 days, which is shorter than both the duration that humans receive antiretroviral drugs as well the development of atherosclerosis in humans; however, Shankar et al, 2005 showed endothelial dysfunction in only 4 weeks in healthy, HIV negative subjects who received the antiretroviral indinavir daily for that period, which suggest that HAART can induce changes in subjects within weeks. Another limitation is that the dosage of AZT administered was approximately 10 times higher than the human dose; note, however, that the half-life of AZT in the plasma of mice is around 5 times less than that of humans (Tan and Boudinot, 2000) and this dosage and time course was previously published; thus our methods are consistent with previous work (Sutliff et al, 2002; Lewis et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiovascular complications include increased incidence of myocardial infarction (Friis-Møller et al, 2003; Mary-Krause et al, 2003; Holmberg et al, 2002) and atherosclerotic lesions (Maggi et al, 2004; Spieker et al, 2005) and elevated preclinical markers of atherosclerosis (e.g., increased carotid intima-media thickness (c-IMT) (van Vonderen et al, 2009; Hsue et al, 2004; Ross et al, 2008), arterial stiffening (van Vonderen et al, 2009; Bonnet et al, 2004; Sevastianova et al, 2005), and impaired flow mediated dilation (FMD) (Bonnet et al, 2004; Calmy et al, 2009; Shankar et al, 2005). Antiretrovirals are typically prescribed in cocktails of three drugs; thus, the roles of specific HAART drugs in the development of atherosclerosis are difficult to determine from clinical data (Lundgren et al, 2008; Worm et al, 2010); viral infection may also play a significant role, further complicating the interpretation of clinical data (Oliviero et al, 2009; Hsue et al, 2009; El-Sadr et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lown originally advocated that the anteroposterior position is superior because it requires less energy to reverse AF 52. Some studies have confirmed this notion,53,54 whereas others have shown no advantage to either paddle position 55,56. Because only ≈4% to 5% of the shocking energy actually reaches the heart,57 minor deviation of this electric field probably has little effect on the final outcome.…”
Section: Presentmentioning
confidence: 99%