2011
DOI: 10.1097/iae.0b013e318207d188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effects of Pascal Panretinal Photocoagulation on Macular Nerve Fiber Layer

Abstract: Compared with 20-millisecond SS-PRP, eyes treated with conventional 100-millisecond single-spot delivered over multiple sessions showed increased total macular thickness at 4 weeks, with a thinning of macular nerve fiber layer at 12 weeks.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it uses a shorter pulse duration of 10-30 ms for either PRP or macular grid photocoagulation. This might result in less destruction within the retina [12,13,14,15,16,17], less thermal diffusion to the choroid, less pain, and better preservation of retinal sensitivity than the conventional laser treatment [18]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it uses a shorter pulse duration of 10-30 ms for either PRP or macular grid photocoagulation. This might result in less destruction within the retina [12,13,14,15,16,17], less thermal diffusion to the choroid, less pain, and better preservation of retinal sensitivity than the conventional laser treatment [18]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After primary laser injury, the laser scar lesions may coalesce, leading to functional damage such as visual field defects and if involving the macula, visual disturbance [2][3][4]. There may be discernible changes to the optic nerve head [1,[4][5][6][7][8][9]. Consequently, it is difficult to ascertain whether an increasing CDR in post PRP treated eyes is due to glaucoma, diabetes related ischemia or simply a non-progressive injury secondary to the PRP itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Whilst it is purported that this PRP is less destructive to the retinal layers, Muqit et al reported thinning of the macular nerve fiber layer [6]. Although, one may assume that this may, with time, translate into peripapillary RNFL loss, they did not examine for this [4,6]. Cankaya et al also suggested that PRP-treated eyes were found to have a significantly thinner mean peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer compared with the eyes in the control group [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conventional judgement of photocoagulation lesions evaluates retinal whitening in three or four categories, [29][30][31] which is observer-dependent and requires evaluation by several investigators in clinical trials. 32 The judgement depends on the latency from application to evaluation as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%