Abstract:Our positive results are consistent with the results of recent studies; which conclude that there is a potential benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in resected gastric cancer.
“…A survival benefit has been shown for one regimen vs another (Cirera et al, 1999;Roth et al, 1999;Waters et al, 1999;Chao et al, 2000) and in a small number of studies with small numbers of patients comparing chemotherapy with best supportive care (Murad et al, 1993;Pyrhonen et al, 1995;Glimelius et al, 1997). The absence of a large randomised study of chemotherapy vs best supportive care has allowed the debate on its merits to continue.…”
This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was designed to evaluate the ability of the orally administered matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, marimastat, to prolong survival in patients with non-resectable gastric and gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Three hundred and sixty-nine patients with histological proof of adenocarcinoma, who had received no more than a single regimen of 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, were randomised to receive either marimastat (10 mg b.d.) or placebo. Patients were treated for as long as was tolerable. The primary endpoint was overall survival with secondary endpoints of time to disease progression and quality of life. At the point of protocol-defined study completion (85% mortality in the placebo arm) there was a modest difference in survival in the intention-to-treat population in favour of marimastat (P=0.07 log-rank test, hazard ratio=1.23 (95% confidence interval 0.98 -1.55)). This survival benefit was maintained over a further 2 years of follow-up (P=0.024, hazard ratio=1.27 (1.03 -1.57)). The median survival was 138 days for placebo and 160 days for marimastat, with 2-year survival of 3% and 9% respectively. A significant survival benefit was identified at study completion in the pre-defined sub-group of 123 patients who had received prior chemotherapy (P=0.045, hazard ratio=1.53 (1.00 -2.34)). This benefit increased with 2 years additional follow-up (P=0.006, hazard ratio=1.68 (1.16 -2.44)), with 2-year survival of 5% and 18% respectively. Progression-free survival was also significantly longer for patients receiving marimastat compared to placebo (P=0.009, hazard ratio=1.32 (1.07 -1.63)). Marimastat treatment was associated with the development of musculoskeletal pain and inflammation. Events of anaemia, abdominal pain, jaundice and weight loss were more common in the placebo arm. This is one of the first demonstrations of a therapeutic benefit for a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor in cancer patients. The greatest benefit was observed in patients who had previously received chemotherapy. A further randomised study of marimastat in these patients is warranted.
“…A survival benefit has been shown for one regimen vs another (Cirera et al, 1999;Roth et al, 1999;Waters et al, 1999;Chao et al, 2000) and in a small number of studies with small numbers of patients comparing chemotherapy with best supportive care (Murad et al, 1993;Pyrhonen et al, 1995;Glimelius et al, 1997). The absence of a large randomised study of chemotherapy vs best supportive care has allowed the debate on its merits to continue.…”
This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was designed to evaluate the ability of the orally administered matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, marimastat, to prolong survival in patients with non-resectable gastric and gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Three hundred and sixty-nine patients with histological proof of adenocarcinoma, who had received no more than a single regimen of 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, were randomised to receive either marimastat (10 mg b.d.) or placebo. Patients were treated for as long as was tolerable. The primary endpoint was overall survival with secondary endpoints of time to disease progression and quality of life. At the point of protocol-defined study completion (85% mortality in the placebo arm) there was a modest difference in survival in the intention-to-treat population in favour of marimastat (P=0.07 log-rank test, hazard ratio=1.23 (95% confidence interval 0.98 -1.55)). This survival benefit was maintained over a further 2 years of follow-up (P=0.024, hazard ratio=1.27 (1.03 -1.57)). The median survival was 138 days for placebo and 160 days for marimastat, with 2-year survival of 3% and 9% respectively. A significant survival benefit was identified at study completion in the pre-defined sub-group of 123 patients who had received prior chemotherapy (P=0.045, hazard ratio=1.53 (1.00 -2.34)). This benefit increased with 2 years additional follow-up (P=0.006, hazard ratio=1.68 (1.16 -2.44)), with 2-year survival of 5% and 18% respectively. Progression-free survival was also significantly longer for patients receiving marimastat compared to placebo (P=0.009, hazard ratio=1.32 (1.07 -1.63)). Marimastat treatment was associated with the development of musculoskeletal pain and inflammation. Events of anaemia, abdominal pain, jaundice and weight loss were more common in the placebo arm. This is one of the first demonstrations of a therapeutic benefit for a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor in cancer patients. The greatest benefit was observed in patients who had previously received chemotherapy. A further randomised study of marimastat in these patients is warranted.
“…However, the prognosis of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer is generally poor even with curative resection (Noguchi et al, 1989;Shiu et al, 1989;Fuchs and Mayer, 1995). Adjuvant chemotherapy has failed to demonstrate a significant survival benefit for such patients in most randomized trials and meta-analyses, except in a few studies with positive results (Shiu et al, 1989;Krook et al, 1991;Kim et al, 1992;Hermans et al, 1993;Nakazato et al, 1994;Fuchs and Mayer, 1995;Lise et al, 1995;Macdonald et al, 1995;Kelsen, 1996;Kim et al, 1998;Cirera et al, 1999;Earle and Maroun, 1999).…”
“…The prognosis of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer is generally poor even with curative resection, which is an essential treatment for the long-term survival of patients (Noguchi et al, 1989;Fuchs and Mayer, 1995). Adjuvant chemotherapy has failed to demonstrate a significant survival benefit for such patients in most randomized trials and meta-analyses although a recent study showed improved survival with postoperative chemoradiotherapy compared to surgery alone (Krook et al, 1991;Hermans et al, 1993;Fuchs and Mayer, 1995;Lise et al, 1995;Macdonald et al, 1995;Kelsen, 1996;Kim et al, 1998;Cirera et al, 1999;Earle and Maroun, 1999;Macdonald et al, 2001).…”
Both 5-fluorouracil and doxorubicin are commonly used agents in chemotherapy of gastric cancer in adjuvant setting as well as metastatic disease. In a variety of malignancies, high expression of multidrug resistance-associated protein1 and P-glycoprotein has been associated with resistance to doxorubicin, whereas 5-fluorouracil resistance has correlated with the level of thymidylate synthase expression. We evaluated the expression of multidrug resistance-associated protein1, P-glycoprotein, and thymidylate synthase using immunohistochemistry in 103 locally advanced gastric cancer patients (stage IB-IV) who underwent 5-fluorouracil and doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection and investigated the association between their expression and clinicopathologic characteristics including prognosis of the patients. While high expression (55% of tumour cells positive) of multidrug resistance-associated protein1 and P-glycoprotein was observed in 70 patients (68%) and 42 patients (41%), respectively, 65 patients (63%) had primary tumours with high expression (525% of tumour cells positive) of thymidylate synthase. There was a significant association between multidrug resistance-associated protein1 and Pglycoprotein expression (P50.0001) as well as P-glycoprotein and thymidylate synthase expression (P50.0001). High multidrug resistance-associated protein1 and P-glycoprotein expressions were associated with well and moderately differentiated histology (P50.0001 and P=0.03, respectively) and intestinal type (P50.0001 and P=0.009, respectively). High multidrug resistance-associated protein1 expression correlated with lymph node metastasis (P=0.037), advanced stage (P=0.015), and older age (P=0.021). Five-year disease-free survival and overall survival of total patients were 55.2% and 56.2%, respectively, with a median follow-up of 68 months. There were no significant differences in disease-free survival and overall survival according to the expression of multidrug resistance-associated protein1 (P=0.902 and P=0.975, respectively), Pglycoprotein (P=0.987 and P=0.955, respectively), and thymidylate synthase (P=0.604 and P=0.802, respectively). Concurrent high expression of these proteins (high multidrug resistance-associated protein1/P-glycoprotein, high multidrug resistanceassociated protein1/thymidylate synthase, high P-glycoprotein/thymidylate synthase) did not correlate with disease-free survival or overall survival. Even high expression of all three proteins was not associated with poor disease-free survival (P=0.919) and overall survival (P=0.852). In conclusion, high expression of multidrug resistance-associated protein1, P-glycoprotein, and thymidylate synthase did not predict poor prognosis of gastric cancer patients treated with 5-fluorouracil and doxorubicinbased adjuvant chemotherapy. A larger study including patients treated with surgical resection alone would be necessary.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.