2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-004-0762-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomization and concealment in surgical trials: a comparison between orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic randomized trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could undermine further the quality of the included randomised controlled trial. With poor methods of concealing the allocation, knowledge of the treatment codes may be gained in advance, increasing the likelihood of selection bias (Li 2005).…”
Section: Potential Biases In the Review Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could undermine further the quality of the included randomised controlled trial. With poor methods of concealing the allocation, knowledge of the treatment codes may be gained in advance, increasing the likelihood of selection bias (Li 2005).…”
Section: Potential Biases In the Review Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two separate studies, RCTs that used inadequate allocation concealment were found to result in an increased estimate of benefit by more than one-third (Schulz et al1995, Moher et al 1998. In an analysis of 29 orthopedic RCTs, 5 did not report the method of concealment (Li et al 2005).…”
Section: Concealment Of Randomizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limits the possibility of selection bias. Most RCTs rely on sealed envelopes for treatment allocation (Li et al 2005). While sealed envelopes are usually a concealed form of randomization, breach of concealment is possible-and even includes illicit opening and transillumination of sealed envelopes (Schulz 1995).…”
Section: Concealment Of Randomizationmentioning
confidence: 99%